IconothecaThe Provenance Record
MenuClose

Gian Lorenzo Bernini

1598-1680

Gian Lorenzo Bernini

Bernini painted by himself about 1623, in his mid-twenties and in the middle of the Borghese commissions. A documented, catalogued self-portrait in the Galleria Borghese, in the same collection as the four marble groups and the two busts he made for the patron who employed him. He painted himself repeatedly; the best known of the other self-portraits was bought during his lifetime by Cardinal Leopoldo de' Medici and is in the Uffizi.

Galleria Borghese, Rome
Gian Lorenzo Bernini
Full nameGiovanni Lorenzo Bernini, called Gian Lorenzo or Gianlorenzo Bernini, Cavaliere Bernini
Worked asSculptor, Architect, Urban planner, Painter
Born7 December 1598 · Naples, then capital of the Spanish Viceroyalty of Naples
Died28 November 1680 · Rome, at his house on the Via della Mercede
Nationality Italian
MovementRoman Baroque
In this archive1 artwork
Sources30 cited
Last verified17 September 2026

About this page 1 artwork in the archive · Last verified 17 September 2026 · 30 sources cited

On this page 15 sections
ContentsClose

Bernini is the sculptor whose name is least in doubt and whose works are most in doubt. He signed almost nothing, he ran the largest sculpture workshop in seventeenth-century Europe, and he delegated on a scale that makes the question is this by Bernini a different question from is this a Bernini. Both are asked constantly, and in the last twenty years the answers have moved. A marble universally accepted as his first solo work from 1926 to 2022 has been struck out of the catalogue. A bronze bought for twenty-five million dollars and given to a public museum is regarded by the former director of the Galleria Borghese as untenable as an autograph work. A marble sold twice in Bratislava as a copy turned out to be the lost papal bust he carved at twenty-three, and went to the Getty for a reported thirty-three million.

What a reader will not find easily, and what this page leads with, is how any of that gets decided. It is not decided by signatures or documents, because there are hardly any. It is decided by fired clay: by the tool grooves, the pinched clay at the back of a figure's neck, and the fingerprints that a conservator at Harvard has spent decades cataloguing; and by marble forensics, by the struts left standing between a carved hand's fingers, by the drilled hole beside Daphne's ring-finger where he began in the wrong place, by the repaired fingers on Apollo's right hand, and by the pieced-in section of drapery on a David that the sources call a monolith.

The other thing worth knowing before anything else is how small the market is. Bernini's auction record was set in 2002 by a terracotta sketch, broken in 2021 by a marble he carved at eighteen with his father, and in between the most consequential Bernini transaction of the century was a private sale that published no hammer price at all. Fewer than a dozen public results of any consequence exist. A collector reading this page is reading nearly the whole market.

Records in this archive

Images

5 plates
Bust of Cardinal Scipione Borghese, first version, inv. CCLXV
Bust of Cardinal Scipione Borghese, first version, inv. CCLXVThe signature achievement of his portrait practice, and the object our own record on it describes. Carrara marble, 1632, 77.2 cm. Identified as the FIRST of the two versions by the inventory number CCLXV painted in red on the socle and by the fault running across the forehead. The Galleria Borghese treats this bust as the point at which Bernini's portraiture becomes the talking portrait: the head turned to the observer's left, the mouth slightly open, as if someone had interrupted him during a conversation. The commission came from Pope Urban VIII, not from the sitter.Galleria Borghese, Rome
The second bust of Scipione Borghese, inv. CCLXVI
The second bust of Scipione Borghese, inv. CCLXVIThe replacement, carved from a fresh block after the first developed a fault, in fifteen nights according to Baldinucci or three days according to his son Domenico. Both busts are autograph, both are in the same museum, and they are within a centimetre of each other in height. Identified here by its own crack, which runs from the lower right of the mozzetta through the centre to the upper left, and by the socle number. Two undisputed autograph marbles of the same man from the same year is an unusual condition, and it is why the identification tests on this maker's portrait busts have to be made on the object rather than on the caption.Galleria Borghese, Rome
Apollo and Daphne
Apollo and DaphneCarrara marble, 1622-1625, 243 cm, Galleria Borghese inv. CV, made for Cardinal Scipione Borghese. The statue on which most of what is known about his carving practice has been established: more dependent on drillwork than any other early work of his, according to research by Coliva, Rockwell and their collaborators; carrying a pentimento hole beside Daphne's right ring-finger where he began to drill in the wrong place; carrying broken and repaired fingers on Apollo's right hand; and carrying laurel branches between Daphne's fingers that are structurally the struts a carver leaves in to brace fragile stone.Galleria Borghese, Rome
David
DavidMarble, 1623-1624, 170 cm, Galleria Borghese inv. LXXVII. Commissioned first by Cardinal Montalto in March 1623 and taken over by Scipione Borghese after Montalto's death that June. The face is Bernini's own, on the museum's own statement. The back carries unfinished areas because he expected the figure to stand against a wall of the Seneca Room; it was moved in the late eighteenth century and the shortcut became visible. A large section of the drapery is a separate piece of stone, and so is the cord of the sling.Galleria Borghese, Rome
Edme Bouchardon after Bernini
Edme Bouchardon after BerniniAn eighteenth-century drawing after a Bernini bust of Scipione Borghese, 258 by 190 millimetres, in the Louvre. Which of the two busts Bouchardon drew is not established in the sources consulted, and that is the useful part: copying began early, the copies do not say which original they record, and the confusion between the two versions is nearly three hundred years old. It is also evidence of the one period when a French sculptor still went to Bernini to learn, before the neoclassical reaction closed him out of the canon for two centuries.Musee du Louvre, Paris, via Reunion des musees nationaux

Chronology

  • 1598

    Born in Naples on 7 December, sixth of the thirteen children of the sculptor Pietro Bernini and Angelica Galante.1

  • 1606

    Pietro Bernini receives a papal commission for the Cappella Paolina of Santa Maria Maggiore and moves the family to Rome. Gian Lorenzo leaves the city only once in his life, for five months.1

  • c. 1613-1616

    Marble portrait bust of Bishop Giovanni Battista Santoni for his tomb in Santa Prassede, the earliest securely attributed work in the 2022 sculpture catalogue.1

  • 1616

    Carves the marble Autumn with his father for Prince Leone Strozzi, aged eighteen. It is the work that set his auction record four centuries later.14

  • 1618

    Cardinal Maffeo Barberini commissions four marble putti from Pietro Bernini for Sant'Andrea della Valle in February; the contract stipulates that the son will assist. This is his first securely documented work.1

  • 1619

    Commissioned to repair and complete the antique Sleeping Hermaphroditus for Cardinal Scipione Borghese.1

  • 1621

    Carves the marble Bust of Pope Paul V, commissioned by Scipione Borghese a few months after the pope's death. He is twenty-three on the museum's account. It is his first official papal portrait.12

  • 1622-1625

    Apollo and Daphne, Carrara marble, 243 cm, for Scipione Borghese; Galleria Borghese inv. CV.2

  • 1623

    Cardinal Montalto commissions a David in March; Montalto dies in June and Scipione Borghese takes over the commission. Bernini's own face is recognisable in the finished figure.3

  • 1623

    Maffeo Barberini is elected Urban VIII in August. Excavation for the Baldacchino foundations begins in June, before the election is a year old and before the basilica is consecrated.119

  • 1626

    St Peter's is reconsecrated by Urban VIII on 18 November after a century of building.1

  • 1629

    Appointed Architect of St Peter's on the death of Carlo Maderno, over the protest of older and trained architects, having had virtually no architectural training. His father Pietro dies the same year.1

  • 1633

    The Baldacchino is gilded; the account headed Oro messo nelli bronzi survives in the archive of the Fabbrica di San Pietro and was published in 2021.6

  • 1632

    Carves two marble busts of Cardinal Scipione Borghese, the second because a fault opened across the forehead of the first. Both are autograph and both are in the Galleria Borghese.5

  • 1636-1646

    The bell towers of St Peter's: commissioned 1636, first tower complete and the facade cracking by 1641, work halted July 1642 when the treasury is drained by the Wars of Castro, both towers demolished on Innocent X's order in February 1646, Bernini fined.1

  • c. 1636-1638

    The affair with Costanza Bonucelli, the attempt on his brother Luigi's life, the slashing of Costanza's face by a servant on his orders, a fine of three thousand scudi remitted by Urban VIII.127

  • 1639

    Marries Caterina Tezio in May, aged forty-one, on Urban VIII's orders. Eleven children follow, the youngest being his biographer Domenico. In the same year he buys the property on the Via della Mercede that becomes his house and studio.1

  • 1644

    Urban VIII dies. Innocent X Pamphilj succeeds him and Bernini's private commissions dry up for four years, though he keeps every office including Architect of St Peter's.1

  • 1647

    Commissioned in the spring to carve two statues for the nave niches of St John Lateran. He never completes them; seven drawings in Leipzig and one clay modello survive.6

  • 1648

    Wins the Four Rivers Fountain commission after a model is placed where Innocent X will walk past it. Pasquinades that September demand bread rather than obelisks and fountains, in the middle of a famine.124

  • 1651-1652

    The Four Rivers Fountain is unveiled on 12 June 1651. The Cornaro Chapel, with the Ecstasy of Saint Teresa, is completed in 1652 for twelve thousand scudi paid by Cardinal Federico Cornaro.2224

  • 1655

    Alexander VII is elected and within days commissions a coffin and a marble skull from Bernini as objects of meditation on death. The skull was identified at Dresden in 2021.6

  • 1656-1667

    St Peter's Square and its colonnade. The Cathedra Petri follows, 1657 to 1666, and the Scala Regia, 1663 to 1666.1

  • 1665

    Sent to Paris under political pressure. Arrives 3 June, leaves mid-October. Three Louvre designs, all eventually refused; one marble bust of Louis XIV; a cornerstone ceremony in October and a halt to construction as soon as he is gone.125

  • 1667

    The Louvre design is formally rejected in favour of the scheme by Le Vau, Le Brun and Claude Perrault. The elephant and obelisk in the Piazza della Minerva, executed by Ercole Ferrata to Bernini's design, is finished the same year.1

  • 1674

    Carves the Blessed Ludovica Albertoni for San Francesco a Ripa in six months, aged seventy-five, under Clement X.1

  • 1679

    The marble Salvator Mundi, the last work in the sculpture catalogue, left in his will to Queen Christina of Sweden. Which surviving bust it is remains disputed.126

  • 1680

    Dies in Rome on 28 November after a stroke, two weeks after stopping work, and is buried without ceremony in the family vault in Santa Maria Maggiore. The planned funerary monument is never built.1

  • 1684-1688

    The equestrian Louis XIV is finished four years after his death, reaches Versailles in 1685, is condemned by the king in November 1685 and recut by Girardon's assistants into Marcus Curtius by September 1687.625

  • 1898

    Rome commemorates him publicly for the first time, with a plaque and a small bust on the front of his house in the Via della Mercede.1

  • 1937

    The Fogg Art Museum buys twenty-seven terracottas from a local collector; fifteen turn out to be associated with Bernini, and become the basis of the modern technical study of his models.10

  • 1955

    Rudolf Wittkower publishes Gian Lorenzo Bernini: The Sculptor of the Roman Baroque, updated in 1966 and 1981 and revised by Phaidon in 1997. It is still the spine of the sculpture catalogue.29

  • 2012-2013

    Bernini: Sculpting in Clay at the Metropolitan Museum and the Kimbell brings almost all the surviving terracottas together for the first time, confirms attributions and reassigns some.89

  • 2015

    The Getty Museum announces the acquisition of the lost Bust of Pope Paul V on 17 June, reportedly for thirty-three million dollars in a private sale arranged by Sotheby's, ten months after it sold in Bratislava for twenty-four thousand euros.1213

  • 2017-2018

    The Galleria Borghese exhibition edited by Andrea Bacchi and Anna Coliva puts contested works side by side and moves several attributions, among them the Toronto bronze crucifix and the Goat Amalthea.6

  • 2021

    Autumn sets a new auction record for the artist at Sotheby's New York in January; a red chalk academy drawing sets the drawings record at Acteon in Compiegne in March.1516

  • 2022

    The Galleria Borghese Catalogo generale, edited by Anna Coliva, removes the Bernini attribution from the Goat Amalthea, held since 1926. Bernardini's two-volume sculpture catalogue appears the same year.629

  • 2024

    The Baldacchino is restored for the first comprehensive time in 260 years and unveiled on 27 October, funded by the Knights of Columbus at about seven hundred thousand euros.18

  • 2025

    The Rijksmuseum receives on permanent loan the terracotta Triton for the Fontana del Moro, the only Bernini sculpture in the Netherlands.17

  • 2026

    Bernini e i Barberini at Palazzo Barberini, 12 February to 14 June, seventy works, for the four hundredth anniversary of the consecration of St Peter's.1920

The market

The market for Bernini is tiny, illiquid and dominated by attribution rather than by condition or provenance. Almost everything he made is immovable, in a Roman church or square or in the Galleria Borghese, or is state property. Sotheby's, offering the 2021 record lot, described it as one of only a handful of sculptures by Bernini and his father remaining in private hands. There is no depth to the market, no cohort of comparables in the sense a collector of nineteenth-century pictures would recognise, and long gaps between events: the auction record stood for nineteen years between 2002 and 2021.

What the record shows is that price here is a function of who has said what in print. The Bust of Pope Paul V failed to sell at an estimate of 47,000 euros in Bratislava in 2013 and was bought at 24,000 euros in September 2014, catalogued after Bernini; ten months later the Getty acquired it for a reported 33 million dollars in a private sale arranged by Sotheby's. The multiple of roughly a thousand measures the value of an attribution and nothing about the object, which did not change. It also shows the reverse risk: Johann Kraftner, director of the Liechtenstein collections, was offered the bust and courteously declined because the provenance was inconclusive, and he was declining a genuine Bernini for exactly the reason a diligent buyer should.

Two structural cautions. First, the two largest numbers attached to Bernini in this century, the 33 million dollars for the Getty bust and the roughly 50 million dollar appraisal reported for the bronze Corpus in Toronto, are both private figures. Neither is a hammer price, neither had a public underbidder, and a private sale arranged by an auction house publishes only what it must. Second, an unattributed Bernini is cheap and a contested one is unsaleable: the Toronto bronze was described as French, late seventeenth century when it failed to reach a 200 dollar asking price at Sotheby's in 1975, and the museums approached before Murray Frum bought it declined it. The difference between those two states is a paragraph in a catalogue.

The drawings are the only part of the market with any regularity, and they behave the same way. A red chalk academy figure consigned at Compiegne in 2021 was estimated at 30,000 to 50,000 euros after being catalogued as Pierre Puget, and hammered at 1.55 million after Patrick de Bayser reattributed it. The previous drawings record was 139,000 euros in 2014.

Auction results for Gian Lorenzo Bernini
DateSaleWorkResultNote
2002Sotheby's, LondonIl Moro, terracotta bozzettoHammer Not separately published in the sources consulted
With premium USD 3,200,000 reported as the price
USD
The auction record for Bernini for nineteen years. Sotheby's own 2020 press release and ARTnews both give the figure as 3.2 million dollars without separating hammer from premium, and both call it the current auction record. Note that a terracotta model of the Moor is also at the Kimbell Art Museum and a second, the study model, entered the Rijksmuseum on loan in 2025; this record does not establish which object the 2002 lot was.
2006Private saleThe Crucified Christ (Corpus), bronze, attributed to BerniniHammer Not applicable; no auction took place
With premium USD 25,000,000 reported as the purchase price
USD
Bought by Murray Frum and given to the Art Gallery of Ontario in 2006, where the appraised value is reported to have risen to about 50 million dollars. Reported by Jonathan Salem-Wiseman, who also reports that no major American museum agreed to buy it. The attribution has since been argued against in print. Figures not independently confirmed.
2014-09Auction in Bratislava; house not named in the source consultedBust of Pope Paul V, marble, 1621Hammer EUR 24,000
With premium Not published in the source consulted
EUR
Sold at its pre-sale estimate of 24,000 euros (about 26,500 dollars) to an unnamed Slovak art dealer, catalogued after Bernini. Franco Mormando records that the 1893 Borghese sale had carried it as Algardi and that the 2014 catalogue read after Bernini. Johann Kraftner, director of the Liechtenstein collections, states that he was offered it and courteously declined on provenance grounds.
2015-07Private sale arranged by Sotheby'sBust of Pope Paul V, marble, 1621Hammer Not applicable; no auction took place
With premium USD 33,000,000 reported as the price paid
USD
Acquired by the J. Paul Getty Museum, announced 17 June 2015 and on view from 18 June. The Getty's own release names no price. The 33 million dollar figure is reported by Artnet News and repeated by Mormando. There is no hammer, no published underbidder, and the Artnet report is internally inconsistent, giving 1893 in one sentence and 1917 in another for the Viennese purchase.
28 January 2021Sotheby's, New YorkAutumn, marble, 1616, by Pietro and Gian Lorenzo BerniniHammer USD 7,500,000
With premium USD 8,900,000 with buyer's premium
USD
Cover lot of Fearless: The Collection of Hester Diamond, estimate 8 to 12 million dollars. Bidding opened at 7 million and the hammer fell at 7.5 million, below the low estimate; the premium-inclusive total of 8.9 million nonetheless set a new auction record for the artist, beating Il Moro. Carved when Gian Lorenzo was eighteen, for Prince Leone Strozzi. Sold to a telephone bidder with Margi Schwartz, Sotheby's co-head of old master sculpture. The sale as a whole made 26.7 million dollars with 11 of 49 lots unsold.
20 March 2021Acteon, CompiegneAcademie d'homme, red chalk drawing, c. 1630-1640Hammer EUR 1,550,000
With premium EUR 1,900,000 reported as the total (about 2.3 million dollars)
EUR
Record for a Bernini drawing. Estimated at 30,000 to 50,000 euros. Found in a French estate by the auctioneer Philomene Wolf and initially catalogued as Pierre Puget; reattributed after review by the old master specialist Patrick de Bayser. Auctioneer Dominique Le Coent reports the buyer as anonymous and based outside France, and states that only seven other academy drawings by Bernini are known, all in museums. The previous drawings record was 139,000 euros in 2014.

Hammer is the price at which the bidding stopped; with premium adds the fee the house charges the buyer on top. Hammer price and buyer's premium in the glossary.

Recorded without a public price

  • 1975 · Bronze crucified Christ (Corpus), later attributed to Bernini · Sotheby's · Unsold Offered in the estate sale of Geraldine Rockefeller Dodge and catalogued as French, late 17th century. It failed to reach an asking price reported as 200 dollars. Bought afterwards by a London antique dealer and thereafter in private hands in Spain and Monte Carlo. Reported by Jonathan Salem-Wiseman; the figure has not been checked against the Sotheby's catalogue.
  • 2013 · Bust of Pope Paul V, marble, 1621 · Auction in Bratislava; house not named in the source consulted · Unsold Consigned by the heirs of the Slovak painter Ernest Zmetak, misattributed, at an estimate of 47,000 euros (about 52,000 dollars). Did not sell.

Where to see the work

Where to see the work of Gian Lorenzo Bernini
InstitutionCityHoldingsNote
Galleria BorgheseRomeAeneas, Anchises and Ascanius; the Rape of Proserpina; Apollo and Daphne (inv. CV, Room 3); David (inv. LXXVII, Room 2); the two busts of Cardinal Scipione Borghese (inv. CCLXV and CCLXVI, Room 14); Truth Unveiled by Time; the Bust of Pope Paul V of 1618; two painted self-portraits; the Goat Amalthea, now disputedThe single indispensable visit. Everything here was made for one patron in one house and most of it is still in that house. Timed entry; the collection was purchased by the Italian state in 1902, except the two Scipione busts, which were bought separately in 1892.
St Peter's Basilica and the VaticanVatican CityThe Baldacchino; the Cathedra Petri; St Longinus; the tombs of Urban VIII and Alexander VII; the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament; the nave decoration; the Scala Regia; the Vision of Constantine; St Peter's Square and its colonnade; terracotta models in the Vatican MuseumsFree to enter the basilica. The Baldacchino was restored in 2024 and is visible without scaffolding for the first time since early that year.
Santa Maria della VittoriaRomeThe Cornaro Chapel with the Ecstasy of Saint Teresa, completed 1652A working parish church, free, in the left transept. The hidden window above the group is the whole point of the design and is only legible in daylight.
Santa Maria del Popolo, Sant'Andrea al Quirinale, Santa Maria sopra Minerva, San Francesco a Ripa, Ponte Sant'Angelo, Piazza Navona, Piazza BarberiniRomeDaniel and Habakkuk; the oval Jesuit novitiate church he built without fee; the Raggi memorial and the elephant obelisk; the Blessed Ludovica Albertoni; the angels; the Four Rivers Fountain and the Fountain of the Moor; the Triton FountainMost of the mature work is outdoors or in churches and costs nothing. Two of the Ponte Sant'Angelo angels carved by Bernini himself are not on the bridge but inside Sant'Andrea delle Fratte.
Museo Nazionale del BargelloFlorenceThe Bust of Costanza Bonucelli, called Bonarelli, c. 1635The most personal object he made and the only one carved for nobody but himself.
J. Paul Getty MuseumLos AngelesBust of Pope Paul V (1621); Boy with a Dragon (1617, with Pietro Bernini); a bronze after Neptune with Dolphin; two drawingsFree admission, paid parking. The Paul V bust went on view in the East Pavilion on 18 June 2015, the day after the acquisition was announced.
Harvard Art MuseumsCambridge, MassachusettsThe largest group of Bernini terracottas anywhere: fifteen associated with him in the 1937 Fogg purchase plus one modello bought in 1995; thirteen on display as of 2024This is where the technical method for attributing Bernini was built, in the Straus Center for Conservation.
Victoria and Albert MuseumLondonNeptune and Triton (1620); the Bust of Thomas Baker (1638); terracottasFree.
Musee du LouvreParisThe Bust of Cardinal Richelieu (1640-41); the Christ Child Playing with a Nail relief; drawingsThe lead copy of the equestrian Louis XIV in the entrance plaza, placed by I. M. Pei in 1989, is a modern cast and not the statue itself.
Palace of VersaillesVersaillesThe marble Bust of Louis XIV (1665), the only finished work of the Paris visit; the equestrian statue recut by Girardon's assistants into Marcus CurtiusThe equestrian statue has been back inside the Orangerie since 2004 after twenty-four years in storage.
Metropolitan Museum of ArtNew YorkA Faun Teased by Children (1616-17), with Pietro Bernini
The Morgan Library and MuseumNew YorkPortrait drawings of Scipione Borghese (IV, 176) and Sisinio PoliThe Scipione sheet is the only located preparatory drawing for the 1632 busts.
RijksmuseumAmsterdamTerracotta study model of a standing Triton for the Fontana del Moro, 1653, 72 cm, on permanent loan from a private collector since January 2025The only Bernini sculpture in the Netherlands. Shown earlier in the 2020 Caravaggio-Bernini exhibition.
Kimbell Art MuseumFort WorthThe more finished terracotta model of the Moor, probably made after the fountain was completed as a gift to the popeFree permanent collection. Co-organiser of the 2012-13 terracotta exhibition.
Art Gallery of OntarioTorontoThe Bust of Pope Gregory XV (1621); the bronze Corpus given by the Murray Frum family in 2006, whose attribution is disputedThe Corpus is displayed as a Bernini. Readers should know that the attribution has been argued against in print, most pointedly by Anna Coliva after the 2017 Borghese comparison with the Escorial crucifix.
Galleria EstenseModenaThe Bust of Francesco I d'Este (1650-51), carved from portraits without the sitter ever posing
National Gallery of ArtWashingtonBust of Francesco Barberini (1626)Free. Lent to Bernini e i Barberini in 2026 and shown in Italy for the first time in many years.
Chrysler Museum of ArtNorfolk, VirginiaA Bust of the SaviorOne of the two or three candidates for the marble Bernini left to Queen Christina of Sweden. Francesco Petrucci noted in the 2017 Borghese catalogue that the museum itself then attributed it to a follower. Check the current label before citing it.
Staatliche Kunstsammlungen DresdenDresdenThe marble skull commissioned by Alexander VII in 1655, bought from the Chigi family in 1728 for Augustus the Strong and identified in 2021Long displayed at Schloss Pillnitz. Franco Mormando argues the attribution should read Bernini and workshop.
National GalleryLondonThe Apostles Andrew and Thomas, c. 1625, oil on canvasFree. The only Bernini painting whose attribution, approximate date and provenance are all securely known.

Forgeries and misattributions

The exposure on Bernini is misattribution, not forgery
No systematic forgery industry in Bernini comparable to the trade-label violin or the fake Old Master picture has been found in the sources read for this page. The recurring loss is different in kind: works that are genuinely from the workshop but not from his hand, works given to him on the authority of a single unreliable seventeenth-century sentence, and works by him that were sold as copies. The financial consequences run in both directions and are large. Technical examination of clay (tool grooves, x-radiography, fingerprints), technical examination of marble (piecing, struts, drill dependence), archival work on the commissioning documents, and above all physical juxtaposition of a contested object with a securely documented one.678
The Goat Amalthea, in the corpus for ninety-six years
The small marble group in the Galleria Borghese (inv. CXVIII, before 1615, 45 cm) was cited by Manilli in 1650 without an artist and treated as anonymous until 1926, when Roberto Longhi endorsed Joachim von Sandrart's 1675 attribution to Bernini. It then became, almost universally, his earliest independent work. Andrea Bacchi questioned it on stylistic grounds in 2009; Anna Coliva removed the attribution in the Galleria Borghese Catalogo generale of 2022, cat. 41. Style, technique and documents together, and specifically the destruction of the source: Bacchi points out that Sandrart, a few lines before mentioning the Goat, gives the Aeneas and Anchises entirely to Pietro Bernini, which no informant briefed by Gian Lorenzo would ever have said, and that Sandrart elsewhere attributes the antique Arrotino to Michelangelo. The museum's own website still carried Attributed to Bernini Gian Lorenzo when read on 25 August 2026.64
The bronze Corpus in Toronto
A large bronze crucified Christ, sold by a Parisian dealer in Venice in 1908, later in the Geraldine Rockefeller Dodge collection, unsold at Sotheby's in 1975 as French late seventeenth century, then attributed to Bernini from 2002 by Maurizio Fagiolo dell'Arco as the crucifix that passed from Cardinal Francesco Barberini to Louis XIV, and from 2005 by Tomaso Montanari as the one Bernini made for himself and gave to Cardinal Sforza Pallavicino in 1665. Bought by Murray Frum for a reported 25 million dollars and given to the Art Gallery of Ontario in 2006. Charles Scribner III argues it is a pastiche in which some elements were cast from Bernini's moulds and others were not, resting chiefly on the absence of the wound in Christ's side, which is present on the securely documented Escorial bronze and on every dead Christ confidently given to Bernini, and on the upward-flying loincloth, which he reads as closer to Alessandro Algardi. Montanari's documentary case was reported as refuted by later archival work published in 2011. Anna Coliva's published position, after the 2017 Borghese exhibition placed the Toronto bronze beside the Escorial one, is that direct execution by Bernini is untenable, citing the lower quality of the casting and the attenuated limbs. The gallery displays it as a Bernini.216
The Bust of Pope Paul V, sold twice as a copy
The inverse case, and the expensive one. Bernini's first papal portrait, commissioned by Scipione Borghese in 1621 a few months after Paul V's death, was sold by the Borghese in 1893 with an attribution to Alessandro Algardi and vanished. Antonio Munoz reported it in a Viennese private collection in 1916. It was later bought by the Slovak painter Ernest Zmetak and kept in his house in Bratislava through war and occupation; his heirs consigned it in 2013 as a copy at 47,000 euros and it did not sell, and it sold in September 2014 at 24,000 euros catalogued after Bernini. The Getty acquired it in 2015 for a reported 33 million dollars. The bust had never been unknown, only lost: scholars knew it from a photograph in the 1893 auction catalogue, from the commission documents, and from Sebastiano Sebastiani's bronze cast of 1621-22 in the Statens Museum for Kunst in Copenhagen. Francesco Petrucci published the rediscovery in Studi di Storia dell'Arte in 2015. The Getty's own release notes that the marble survived in perfect condition.12136
The two Busts of the Savior
Bernini's last sculpture, the marble Salvator Mundi of 1679, was left in his will to Queen Christina of Sweden, passed to Innocent XI and then to the Odescalchi, and disappeared at the end of the eighteenth century. Irving Lavin identified it in 1972 with the bust now in the Chrysler Museum of Art in Norfolk, Virginia; a claim was made in 1999 for a bust in the cathedral of Sees in Normandy; and Francesco Petrucci identified it in 2001 with the bust in San Sebastiano fuori le Mura in Rome, where it now is. Tomaso Montanari holds that the San Sebastiano bust is not by Bernini and points back to Norfolk. Unresolved. The 2017 Galleria Borghese exhibition placed the Norfolk and San Sebastiano busts facing each other for the first time; Petrucci's catalogue entry put a question mark after the Norfolk attribution and noted that the Chrysler Museum itself then gave the work to a follower. Jennifer Montagu defends the Norfolk bust as the work of a Bernini pazzo, conceding that it is unattractive. Franco Mormando rejects it, on the argument that Bernini was documented as mentally and professionally intact to the end, received a major papal commission at seventy-nine, regarded the Savior bust as his most beloved work, and would neither have finished nor gifted to a queen an object of that quality.266
Portrait of an Unidentified Gentleman, LACMA
A marble portrait bust attributed to Bernini, acquired by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art shortly before the Getty's Paul V purchase, and published in 2004 in a volume issued by a New York gallery. Tomaso Montanari proposed that the sitter might be the collector Vincenzo Giustiniani, whose lost Bernini portrait is recorded by Sandrart; by 2021 he had moved away from that identification and called the Giustiniani bust lost. Not resolved. Franco Mormando's observation is the useful one for a buyer: the attribution was taken for granted rather than argued in the 2004 publication, and it is far from universally accepted, because a newly discovered work needs years of examination, comparison and debate before a consensus exists, if one ever does.6
The Damned Soul and the Blessed Soul: right hand, wrong subject
Two small marble busts of about 1619, unmentioned by any source before the inventory of works appended to Baldinucci's 1682 life, where they are given their Christian names. Their first documented owner has long been said to be Monsignor Pedro de Foix Montoya. David Garcia Cueto showed in the Sculpture Journal in 2015 that the first owner was in fact another Spanish cleric, Fernando Botinete y Acevedo, and that the inventory of Botinete's possessions, drawn up with the help of a priest who shared his house, calls them a nymph and a satyr, a pair commonly opposed in antiquity. Archival: a post-mortem inventory read against the church inventory of about 1653, in which the pair first appears under Christian identities. Scholars including Fraschetti, Lavin and Schutze had already noticed their pagan character, and neither bust carries an attribute that would fix a Christian subject.61
The bust of Antonio Coppola
A marble portrait bust in San Giovanni dei Fiorentini in Rome, formerly given to Gian Lorenzo, given to Pietro Bernini in Hans-Ulrich Kessler's 2005 catalogue raisonne of the father and confirmed as Pietro's alone by the 2017 juxtapositions at the Galleria Borghese. Comparison in the flesh with securely attributed works by both men.6

The essay

14 sections · about 6,100 words · 27 min
Chapter 1

The corpus is a moving target, and it has moved recently

There is no single agreed number of works by Bernini, and the honest reason is that the boundary between his hand, his design and his workshop was never a line he had any interest in drawing.

There is no single agreed number of works by Bernini, and the honest reason is that the boundary between his hand, his design and his workshop was never a line he had any interest in drawing. The most recent full catalogue of the sculpture, Maria Grazia Bernardini's Bernini. Catalogo delle sculture, was published by Allemandi in Turin in two volumes in 2022 and reissued in a single volume in 2024. Its own publisher describes it as a catalogue that starts from Rudolf Wittkower's text of 1955 and works forward; the 2024 reissue is advertised as a more inclusive one, which is a plain statement that the boundary of the corpus is an editorial decision that can be taken again.

Four movements in the last two decades give the shape of the problem. The Goat Amalthea with the Infant Jupiter and a Faun in the Galleria Borghese was regarded from 1926 until 2022 as the earliest thing Bernini executed entirely alone; the 2022 Catalogo generale of the Galleria Borghese, edited by Anna Coliva, removes the attribution outright on stylistic, technical and documentary grounds. The marble portrait bust of Antonio Coppola, once given to the son, is now given to the father, Pietro Bernini, and only to him. Going the other way, Steven Ostrow proposed in the Burlington Magazine in July 2016 that a long-ignored portrait on the cenotaph of the canon Giovanni Angelo Frumenti, in the Baptistery of Santa Maria Maggiore, is an autograph work of about 1615 to 1617. And the two small marbles known for three centuries as the Damned Soul and the Blessed Soul were catalogued by their first documented owner as a nymph and a satyr, which is a change not of hand but of subject, and therefore of what the objects were for.

A detail worth recording, because it is the sort of thing a researcher trips over: the Galleria Borghese's own online catalogue entry for the Goat Amalthea, read on 25 August 2026, still heads the work Attributed to Bernini Gian Lorenzo and says only that some critics do not consider it autograph. The printed catalogue of 2022 and the website of the same museum do not say the same thing. Anyone citing the Borghese on this object has to say which Borghese they mean.

Chapter 2

His father taught him, and his father is still in the marble

Pietro Bernini was a Florentine Mannerist sculptor working in Naples, where Gian Lorenzo was born on 7 December 1598, the sixth of thirteen children by Angelica Galante.

Pietro Bernini was a Florentine Mannerist sculptor working in Naples, where Gian Lorenzo was born on 7 December 1598, the sixth of thirteen children by Angelica Galante. In 1606 Pietro took a papal commission for a marble relief in the Cappella Paolina of Santa Maria Maggiore and moved the whole family to Rome, where his son stayed for the rest of his life apart from five months in Paris and short trips to Civitavecchia, Tivoli and Castelgandolfo.

The training was not a schooling followed by an independent career; it was a joint practice, and several surviving works are by general consent the work of both men. The Autumn sold at Sotheby's in 2021 is catalogued as by Pietro and Gian Lorenzo together, carved in 1616 for Prince Leone Strozzi when the son was eighteen. The first securely documented work of Gian Lorenzo's is a collaboration on his father's contract: in February 1618 Cardinal Maffeo Barberini commissioned four marble putti from Pietro for the family chapel in Sant'Andrea della Valle, and the contract stipulates that the son will assist.

This matters far beyond biography, because the father's presence is a live attribution problem and not a sentimental one. Joachim von Sandrart, writing in 1675 and still cited as an eyewitness, attributed the Aeneas, Anchises and Ascanius entirely and solely to Pietro. Andrea Bacchi's point about that, made in 2009 and quoted by Franco Mormando, is that a source who gives the Aeneas to the father alone cannot have had his information from Gian Lorenzo, who would never have conceded it; and that the same source's authority is what the Goat Amalthea attribution rested on. A single unreliable seventeenth-century sentence held a work in the corpus for ninety-six years.

Chapter 3

The Borghese years, and the four groups that made the reputation

Scipione Borghese was the reigning pope's nephew, the most powerful private collector in Rome, and Bernini's maker.

Scipione Borghese was the reigning pope's nephew, the most powerful private collector in Rome, and Bernini's maker. Between 1618 and 1625 the sculptor produced for him the four marble groups that are still the reason people queue at the Villa Pinciana: Aeneas, Anchises and Ascanius of 1618 to 1619; the Rape of Proserpina of 1621 to 1622; Apollo and Daphne, Galleria Borghese inventory CV, dated 1622 to 1625, Carrara marble, 243 centimetres high; and the David, inventory LXXVII, 1623 to 1624, 170 centimetres. He was between nineteen and twenty-six.

The museum's own catalogue entry for the David carries two facts that most accounts drop. The commission was not originally Scipione's: Cardinal Montalto had commissioned a David from Bernini for his villa in March 1623, the project was suspended when Montalto died unexpectedly in June, and Scipione took it over. And the figure's face is Bernini's own, as the museum puts it, according to our sources. The self-portrait is not a legend attached later; it is in the institutional record of the object.

The same entry records something a technician notices and a visitor cannot: the back of the David has unfinished areas, because Bernini expected it to stand against a wall of the Seneca Room and calculated that nobody would ever see them. It was moved in the late eighteenth century and the calculation was exposed. All four groups were designed for one dominant viewpoint even though they are carved in the round, and that is the single most useful thing to know when looking at a photograph of one: a plate shot from the wrong side is not a record of the sculpture, it is a record of the back of it.

Two further Borghese jobs are usually left out and should not be. In 1619 the young Bernini was given the restoration and completion of an antiquity, the Sleeping Hermaphroditus, and around 1622 the so-called Ludovisi Ares. Restoring antiques was ordinary studio work and it is also where a young sculptor learned to make new marble read as old marble, which is a skill with obvious consequences for anyone later trying to tell his hand from another's.

Chapter 4

How a Bernini marble is actually made, and why the drill proves nothing

The single most productive technical account in print is Michael Cole's essay Bernini Struts, and its argument is that the famous virtuosity is legible as a sequence of practical decisions and...

The single most productive technical account in print is Michael Cole's essay Bernini Struts, and its argument is that the famous virtuosity is legible as a sequence of practical decisions and near-accidents. Anna Coliva's 2002 study of Bernini's executive technique established that the young Bernini accepted the sixteenth-century rule that a virtuoso group had to be monolithic, cut from one block, as Michelangelo, Bandinelli, Giambologna and Ippolito Scalza had done. The Raccolta di statue antiche e moderne of 1704 duly states that the Apollo and Daphne was carved for Cardinal Borghese in un solo marmo.

It was not, quite. Part of Proserpina's hair is inserted into the abduction group. A large section of drapery in the David is a separate piece, and so is the cord of the sling, whose stone is not continuous with the rest of the statue. Cole is careful that we cannot tell whether these were planned or were repairs after the marble snapped under the chisel, and that uncertainty is the honest state of the evidence. In the 1630s, with the colossal figures for the crossing of St Peter's, Bernini abandoned the rule altogether: the St Longinus of 1631 to 1638 was an example of how to hide joins with drapery, and in the chapels stucco is finished to pass for stone.

The diagnostic detail is the strut. To carve a hand with splayed fingers a sculptor drills out the spaces between the digits, hollows with a rasp and a small chisel, and leaves bridges of stone in place to brace the fragile parts while the rest of the statue is worked; the struts come off last, or not at all. In the Apollo and Daphne there is a pentimento in the stone beside Daphne's right ring-finger, a hole where Bernini began drilling before realising the gap needed to open further to one side. Apollo's right hand has broken and repaired fingers. The laurel branches running between Daphne's fingers, whatever else they are, are structurally struts that the carver did not quite dare to cut away.

Research by Coliva, Peter Rockwell and their collaborators found that the Apollo and Daphne depends more heavily on drillwork than any other early Bernini statue. The temptation is to make the drill the signature, and that is exactly the error Cole warns against: Giuliano Finelli's portrait busts show him a great master of the drill, and so do the statues of Pietro Bernini closest in date to his son's first works. Heavy drillwork places a marble in this workshop. It does not name a hand inside it. Jennifer Montagu caused a sensation by arguing that the most famous passages of the Apollo and Daphne were executed by Finelli rather than by Bernini, and the argument has never been closed.

Chapter 5

The clay is the signature

Bernini designed in wet clay, at speed, with his fingers.

Bernini designed in wet clay, at speed, with his fingers. He is reported by Sandrart to have shown him twenty-two wax models, each about twenty-six inches high, all preparatory for the single figure of St Longinus, at a time when a sculptor normally made one or two. Not one wax by Bernini survives. What survives is fired terracotta, and the surviving terracottas are now the primary instrument of attribution for his whole output.

The method was built at Harvard. In 1937 the Fogg Art Museum bought twenty-seven terracottas from a local collector; fifteen of them, with one modello added in 1995, are associated with Bernini, and the conservator Anthony Sigel set out over three years to answer a question he stated flatly: what is it that makes a terracotta a Bernini terracotta, what technically characterises a model from his hand, his idiosyncratic personal sculptural handwriting. The tools were close visual examination and x-radiography. He poured silicone into the grooves to recreate the modelling tools that made them. The habits he isolated are specific enough to be tested against a new object: clay pinched between thumb and index finger at the back of the neck, the thumb pushing around a limb rather than along it, shoulders shaped by pulling the fingers from front to back beside the neck, with the tracks and often a fingerprint left in the mound of displaced clay at the end of the stroke. Complete fingerprints, where they survive, are inventoried.

The 2012 exhibition Bernini: Sculpting in Clay, organised by the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Kimbell Art Museum, put this to work on almost every surviving model at once and, in the words of one review, applied techniques akin to those of forensic science to confirm attributions and to reassign some models previously believed to be by Bernini. An x-radiograph of the model for the lion of the Four Rivers Fountain showed that near the end of modelling the solid clay animal was cut in two just forward of the rear haunches and a wedge inserted to lengthen the torso by a few centimetres, which is evidence that the design was still moving while the model was being made. The fragmentary model for the Longinus unearthed in 1982 carries the same tooth-marked surface that makes the finished marble sparkle in the changing light of the crossing.

How many survive is contested and the figures should not be averaged. The Metropolitan's 2012 release describes fifteen at Harvard as the largest collection in the world and shows thirty-nine models with thirty drawings; the accompanying catalogue examines fifty-two. Harvard Magazine in 2024 reports thirteen on display as the largest such collection in the world and puts total survival at forty to fifty, against Sigel's estimate that Bernini made thousands. The count depends on where the line is drawn between the master and the assistants, which is the same question the terracottas were being used to settle.

Chapter 6

Urban VIII, the monopoly, and a bronze canopy the height of a palace

Maffeo Barberini, Bernini's friend and former tutor, was elected pope in August 1623 and Bernini's career became, until Urban's death in 1644, close to a monopoly.

Maffeo Barberini, Bernini's friend and former tutor, was elected pope in August 1623 and Bernini's career became, until Urban's death in 1644, close to a monopoly. He was made curator of the papal art collection, director of the papal foundry at Castel Sant'Angelo and commissioner of the fountains of Piazza Navona, and in 1629, on the death of Carlo Maderno and over the protest of older and trained men, Architect of St Peter's. He had had virtually no architectural training.

The Baldacchino is the work that defined what the position meant. Excavation for the foundations began in June 1623, months after Urban's election and before the basilica was consecrated in November 1626; the canopy was finished in 1633 or 1634 depending on which terminus is counted. Its four helical bronze columns are twenty metres high, the whole structure stands about ninety-two feet, and it cost in the region of two hundred thousand Roman scudi. The helical form quotes the ancient marble columns that the Middle Ages believed Constantine had brought from the Temple in Jerusalem, eight of which still stand in pairs on the piers alongside it, so the canopy is an argument about descent and legitimacy before it is an ornament.

Three things about it are usually left out. First, the design was not entirely his: an early scheme with arches carrying a triumphant Christ proved structurally unworkable, and the volute solution that now supports the globe and cross is credited by the 2026 Palazzo Barberini exhibition to Francesco Borromini, who was then a collaborator and later the enemy. Second, the source of the bronze was a scandal in its own time. It was widely believed to have been stripped from the Pantheon; Urban's accounts state that about ninety per cent of the Pantheon bronze went to make a cannon and that the canopy's metal came from Venice, and the lampoon pinned to the statue of Pasquino, that what the barbarians did not do the Barberini did, has outlived the accounts. Third, the eight Barberini coats of arms on the four plinths run as a sequence in which a woman's face contracts, screams and is finally replaced by the head of a putto; the reading of the sequence as childbirth is not disputed, the explanation of why it is there is, with a symbolic account of the labour of the Church competing with two anecdotes about Barberini pregnancies.

A document published in 2021 by Maria Grazia D'Amelio from the archives of the Fabbrica di San Pietro, headed Oro messo nelli bronzi and dated 1633, records the gilding, and the point made from it is that the gold is not decoration but optics: it was calibrated to the light of the transept so that the spiralling columns would keep changing as the daylight changed. Bernini was designing for a moving light source, in a building, at the scale of a hundred feet.

Chapter 7

The Cornaro Chapel, and what the Counter-Reformation actually asked art to do

The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa was made in the years when Bernini had no papal work, and it was paid for by a Venetian cardinal, Federico Cornaro, who had chosen an unremarkable Discalced Carmelite...

The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa was made in the years when Bernini had no papal work, and it was paid for by a Venetian cardinal, Federico Cornaro, who had chosen an unremarkable Discalced Carmelite church for his burial chapel. The ensemble was completed in 1652 at a cost of twelve thousand scudi. Teresa of Avila had been canonised in 1622, twenty-five years before Bernini began, so this is a new saint being installed, not an old cult being decorated.

The subject is taken from a text: Teresa's own account, in her autobiography, of a seraph with a golden spear tipped with fire driven repeatedly into her heart, a pain she describes as so sweet that she did not wish to be rid of it. Bernini follows the text and then supplies everything the text does not specify, including the position of her body, and Franco Mormando's judgement is that no other artist rendering the scene, before or after, dared as much in transforming the saint's appearance. The chapel's machinery is literal: natural light through a window hidden in the dome of the aedicule, gilded stucco rays, more than twenty kinds of coloured marble, and relief portraits of the Cornaro men in what read unmistakably as theatre boxes on either wall, in animated conversation about what is happening in front of them. Wittkower's reading is that the degrees of reality are differentiated on purpose, the Cornaro belonging to our space and the vision isolated in its own. Irving Lavin called the result the unified work of art, and used Bernini's own biographer's term, bel composto, for the method.

The charge of indecency is as old as the work and has never gone away. It has been called astounding and offensive by nineteenth-century critics; Anna Jameson wanted it destroyed; Simon Schama's position is that scholars tie themselves in knots trying to avoid the obvious; the counter-arguments are that Bernini followed Teresa's text, that the Church had long accepted that mystical union carried an erotic charge in its language, and that there is no nudity in the marble. This publication takes no side. What is worth saying is that the dispute is evidence about the object: an image commissioned for a burial chapel, by a cardinal, of a saint canonised in living memory, was already producing this argument in the seventeenth century, which tells you what the Counter-Reformation had licensed art to attempt.

Chapter 8

The bell towers, the fine, and the fountain that ended the disgrace

In 1636 Urban VIII ordered Bernini to design and build the two bell towers long intended for the facade of St Peter's, on foundations Maderno had laid decades before.

In 1636 Urban VIII ordered Bernini to design and build the two bell towers long intended for the facade of St Peter's, on foundations Maderno had laid decades before. The first tower was finished in 1641 and cracks appeared in the facade. Work continued, the first storey of the second tower went up, and work stopped in July 1642 only because the papal treasury had been drained by the Wars of Castro. When Urban died in 1644 and the fiercely anti-Barberini Innocent X Pamphilj succeeded him, Bernini's enemies, Borromini among them, raised the alarm over the cracks and put the blame on him. Innocent ordered both towers demolished in February 1646, and Bernini was fined heavily for the failure.

The investigations found that the cause was Maderno's defective foundations, and a further meticulous inquiry in 1680 under Innocent XI confirmed it. By then the demolition was thirty-four years old. His son's account has him retreating into himself and carving the unfinished Truth Unveiled by Time of 1647 as a private statement that time would eventually produce the truth and clear him, which it did.

The received story of four years in the wilderness needs one correction. Innocent kept him in every office he held, including Architect of St Peter's, and the decoration of the nave went on under his direction throughout. In the spring of 1647 he was commissioned to carve two statues, of Saints Luke and Bartholomew, for the nave niches of St John Lateran, a major project involving every eminent sculptor in Rome; he never completed them, for reasons nobody has established, but seven drawings in Leipzig and a clay modello in the Museo di Roma survive from the work. The eclipse was a loss of favour and of private commissions, not an exclusion.

The Four Rivers Fountain is the work that ended the disgrace, and the way he won it is documented as an act of theatre. Innocent X had designs made by the leading architects of Rome and pointedly did not ask Bernini. Baldinucci's account is that Prince Niccolo Ludovisi, whose wife was the pope's niece, persuaded Bernini to make a model and had it installed in a room of the Palazzo Pamphilj that the pope had to walk through; the pope stopped in front of it and said that whoever does not wish to use Bernini's designs must take care not to see them. Wikipedia's account of the same episode credits the manoeuvring to the pope's sister-in-law Donna Olimpia. The two versions are not reconciled in the sources read for this page.

The fountain was unveiled on 12 June 1651 with a festival paid for by the Pamphilj. It carries four river gods for the four continents through which papal authority had spread, the Nile's head veiled because the source of the Nile was not then known, the Rio de la Plata seated on a pile of coins for the silver of the Americas, all of it in awe of an Egyptian obelisk brought to Rome by Caracalla and topped with the Pamphilj dove. It is a diagram of universal jurisdiction, and it was built at public expense during the famine of 1646 to 1648. In September 1648 protesters pinned handwritten invectives to the stone blocks of the obelisk saying that what was wanted was not obelisks and fountains but bread. Innocent had the authors arrested and put spies in plain clothes around the Pasquino statue and the piazza; the street vendors, among them the Roman Jews who had been permitted a Wednesday market for used clothing there, were driven out by the papal police because the pope thought they detracted from the magnificence of the square. The most delightful fountain in Europe has that under it, and a record that leaves it out has not described the object.

The tourist story that one of the river gods shields his eyes from Borromini's facade of Sant'Agnese is false: the fountain was finished years before the church facade was begun. It is worth repeating only because it is the single most repeated sentence about the work.

Chapter 9

Alexander VII, and a city rebuilt

Under Fabio Chigi, elected as Alexander VII in 1655, Bernini became the principal instrument of a deliberate programme to remake Rome as a capital.

Under Fabio Chigi, elected as Alexander VII in 1655, Bernini became the principal instrument of a deliberate programme to remake Rome as a capital. The colonnade of St Peter's Square, built between 1656 and 1667, took an irregular open space and gave it two semicircular arms of plain Doric columns four rows deep, producing an arena in which a crowd could see the pope on the basilica loggia or at the palace window and carriages could still move. Inside, the Cathedra Petri in the apse, finished between 1657 and 1666, answered the Baldacchino down the length of the nave and resolved a liturgical problem that had been open for decades, the high altar of a Latin cross church sitting in the crossing rather than the chancel: the view down the nave now compresses the tomb of the first pope, his chair and his living successor into one image. The Scala Regia, 1663 to 1666, joined two irregular buildings across an even more irregular space by optical trickery.

Not everything was colossal. He built the small oval church of Sant'Andrea al Quirinale for the Jesuit novitiate entirely without fee, and it is the one work his son records him as being genuinely pleased with. The elephant carrying an obelisk in the Piazza della Minerva, commissioned in 1665, was executed by his pupil Ercole Ferrata to his design and finished in 1667; Bernini had seen two live elephants in Rome, in 1630 and 1655, and it shows. Alexander's own summary of the relationship, that if everything made by the Cavalier Bernini were removed from St Peter's the temple would be stripped bare, is the fairest thing anyone said about the scale of the intervention.

One small commission is a good measure of how the studio actually worked. Within days of his election Alexander ordered from Bernini a coffin and a marble skull to keep in his private rooms as objects of meditation on death. Both disappeared for centuries; the skull was identified in 2021 at Dresden, where it had been since 1728, bought from the Chigi family for Augustus the Strong. The Dresden curator's argument was that a commission taken three days into a pontificate by an artist who had fallen out of favour would have been made by his own hand. Mormando's rebuttal is that Alexander was favourable to Bernini from the start, that Bernini was desperately busy, and that the correct attribution is Bernini and workshop, because for small items the pope was buying a guarantee of quality from a general contractor and both parties knew it. Which of them is right is not settled; that the argument exists over a single skull is the point.

Chapter 10

Paris 1665: five months, one bust, and a palace that was never built

He did not want to go. At the end of April 1665 he was sent to Paris under pressure from both the French court and his own pope, to complete the east front of the Louvre for Louis XIV.

He did not want to go. At the end of April 1665 he was sent to Paris under pressure from both the French court and his own pope, to complete the east front of the Louvre for Louis XIV. He arrived on 3 June and stayed until mid-October. Louis assigned Paul Freart de Chantelou to him as companion and translator, and Chantelou's journal of the visit is the closest thing we have to a daily record of Bernini talking; Charles Perrault, then assistant to the controller-general Colbert, left a rival first-hand account.

He submitted three designs for the facade. The first, with curved wings in the Italian manner, was rejected almost at once. The second was rejected too and no image of it appears to survive. The third was praised by the king, who held a formal ceremony to lay the cornerstone in October 1665, and construction was stopped as soon as Bernini left the country; the rejection was not made formal until 1667. The story told in most books, that the designs were refused as too Italianate or too Baroque, is one Mormando has challenged directly: aesthetics are not mentioned in any of the surviving memoranda from Colbert or the court's advisers, and the explicit objections were practical, including the security of the building and the location of the latrines.

Leibniz, resident in Paris in the 1670s, wrote down Perrault's version of events, and it is the most useful hostile account we have. In it, Colbert asks the nuncio to write to Bernini and sends him the existing plan; Bernini replies not with a completion but with an entirely new building, and pleads that he cannot judge the Louvre without seeing it; he is brought over at great expense, receives great gifts and costs the treasury fifty thousand ecus; his plan is full of gross errors and would have required the existing Louvre to be razed; the Perrault brothers write a memorandum listing the errors, Colbert questions Bernini's deputy Mattia de' Rossi, and on hearing the confirmation says only: enough. Leibniz also records that Bernini despised everything he was shown in France, which the French sources say too.

The trip produced one finished object, the marble Bust of Louis XIV now at Versailles. According to Perrault it was Bernini who proposed the bust as soon as he arrived, and Perrault is the only source for that; a letter of 22 June 1665 has Perrault telling Colbert that Bernini was finding every excuse not to make a full-length statue of the king. Most of the sketching was done at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. He had brought his chief assistant in sculpture, Giulio Cartari, with him, which suggests he had come prepared to carve. The unbuilt Louvre design nevertheless circulated across Europe in engravings, and its direct influence is visible at Chatsworth.

Chapter 11

The horse that was recarved into another man

Back in Rome, Bernini made a colossal equestrian statue of Louis XIV, cut from a single block said by his early biographers to be the largest ever seen in the city.

Back in Rome, Bernini made a colossal equestrian statue of Louis XIV, cut from a single block said by his early biographers to be the largest ever seen in the city. It was completed in 1684, four years after his death, shipped from Civitavecchia that autumn, and reached Paris in March 1685. Alexandre Maral's catalogue of Francois Girardon reconstructs what happened next almost month by month.

A rumour that it would stand near the Pont-Royal died with the king's displeasure. In August 1685 it went to Versailles and into the Orangerie. On 14 November Louis saw it and resolved to have it destroyed; Philippe de Courcillon recorded the decision. In December his closest ministers proposed removing the head and substituting a suitable one instead. In December 1686 Louvois ordered a plaster cast of the king's head so that a replacement could be modelled and tested by Girardon. What was actually done, by Girardon's assistants rather than by Girardon, was smaller and cleverer: a helmet was added to the existing head rather than the head replaced, the king's long hair became the crest of that helmet, and the rocks and military standards below the horse were recut into flames. The statue became Marcus Curtius riding into the chasm, a subject that suited the horse's contorted posture better than a portrait of a reigning monarch did. Nicodemus Tessin the Younger saw the transformed statue in September 1687 and remarked that the great reputation of Bernini had in some way been shipwrecked towards the end of his days. Girardon was paid in January 1688. Maral's verdict is that, asked to make Bernini's work tolerable, Girardon achieved it with the smallest intervention possible.

The statue was moved to the piece d'eau des Suisses in 1702, where the pool stood in for the abyss, put in storage in 1980, and returned to the Orangerie in 2004, where it is today. Two footnotes. The papal nuncio Angelo Ranuzzi, writing to Rome on 17 December 1685, reported that the statue had met with universal disapproval, and the reason the subject was still live in December is that Bernini's eldest son had been pressing the papal Secretary of State to get Louis to pay the pensions promised to his father; Ranuzzi's advice was that this was not the moment. And in 1989 I. M. Pei placed a faithful lead copy of the equestrian Louis XIV as the sole ornament of his new entrance plaza at the Louvre, so the rejected statue is now the only sculpture in front of the building it failed to be given.

Chapter 12

A razor, an arranged marriage, and forty years of daily Mass

In the late 1630s Bernini was involved with Costanza, the wife of his workshop assistant Matteo Bonucelli, and carved her portrait, now in the Bargello in Florence: probably the first marble portrait...

In the late 1630s Bernini was involved with Costanza, the wife of his workshop assistant Matteo Bonucelli, and carved her portrait, now in the Bargello in Florence: probably the first marble portrait of a woman who was not an aristocrat by a major artist in European history, and made for himself rather than for a patron. Sarah McPhee's archival work established that her married name was legally Bonucelli and not Bonarelli, the form under which she has been catalogued for centuries, and that she generally used her maiden name, Piccolomini.

When he discovered that his younger brother Luigi, his right hand in the studio, was also involved with her, he chased Luigi through the streets and into Santa Maria Maggiore and came close to killing him, and he sent a servant to Costanza's house to slash her face with a razor. The servant was jailed. Costanza was jailed for adultery. Bernini was fined three thousand scudi for attempted homicide against his brother and the fine was remitted by Urban VIII, who then ordered him to marry; in May 1639, aged forty-one, he married the twenty-two-year-old Caterina Tezio, by whom he had eleven children, the youngest being his biographer Domenico. Luigi brought a second scandal on the family in 1670 by raping a young workshop assistant on the site of the Constantine memorial in St Peter's. This is documented, it is in the standard literature, and it belongs on the page because the anti-hagiographic scholarship of the last fifteen years exists precisely because the early biographies suppress it.

The devotion is documented too, and it is not decoration. Judith Hook's account records that his favourite books were the Imitation of Christ of Thomas a Kempis and the Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius Loyola, that for the last forty years of his life he went to church daily and communicated twice a week, and that he was an intimate friend of the Jesuit general Gian Paolo Oliva, for the second volume of whose Prediche he designed the frontispiece. A devotional account published by the Jesuit press adds that he made the Spiritual Exercises repeatedly, carried a copy with him and heard Mass daily at the Gesu; that source is tertiary and the specifics should be checked against Domenico and Baldinucci before being relied on. It was through Bernini that his protege Giovanni Battista Gaulli got the vault of the Gesu, the Jesuit mother church, to fresco. The last work Bernardini's catalogue admits is the marble Salvator Mundi of 1679, which he kept and left in his will to Queen Christina of Sweden; Baldinucci reports that he thought of it as his most beloved child.

What is not supported is the reduction of the man to an instrument of papal doctrine. That is how the three dominant scholars of the previous generation, Wittkower, Hibbard and Lavin, can be read; Tomaso Montanari's La liberta di Bernini of 2016 and Mormando's biography of 2011 argue the opposite, that he kept a real distance from the mindset and the mores of Counter-Reformation Rome. Evonne Levy's assessment is that Montanari's achievement was to expose how much the early biographies suppressed, including his conflicts with patrons and his avowed limitations in painting and architecture.

Chapter 13

Forgotten on purpose, then decided again

Bernini died on 28 November 1680 after a stroke, having worked until a fortnight before the end, and was buried with almost no ceremony in the plain family vault in Santa Maria Maggiore beside his...

Bernini died on 28 November 1680 after a stroke, having worked until a fortnight before the end, and was buried with almost no ceremony in the plain family vault in Santa Maria Maggiore beside his parents. A funerary monument had been planned and was never built. Rome put nothing public up to him until 1898, when a plaque and a small bust were fixed to the front of his house on the Via della Mercede on the anniversary of his birth. Two hundred and eighteen years is a long time for a city he had substantially designed.

The reason is that the eighteenth century decided against him deliberately. Colen Campbell opened Vitruvius Britannicus in 1715 by naming Bernini and Borromini as proof that Italian building had degraded after Palladio. Johann Joachim Winckelmann, the man most responsible for the discipline of art history, held that Bernini had been corrupted by flattering the coarse and uncultivated in order to make everything more intelligible to them. Francesco Milizia, Joshua Reynolds and Jacob Burckhardt all disparaged him in print. Augustus Hare's Walks in Rome, which went through twenty-two editions between 1871 and 1925 and told the English-speaking world what to look at, described the angels of the Ponte Sant'Angelo as Bernini's breezy maniacs. Most popular guides of the period simply left him out.

Recovery began with Stanislao Fraschetti's monograph of 1900 and was consolidated by Rudolf Wittkower's Gian Lorenzo Bernini: The Sculptor of the Roman Baroque of 1955, updated in 1966 and 1981 and revised again by Phaidon in 1997. Wittkower's is still the reference point in a literal sense: the 2022 and 2024 Bernardini catalogue is built out from his text rather than replacing it. Evonne Levy's survey of the field since the 1980s, published in the 2017 Galleria Borghese exhibition catalogue edited by Andrea Bacchi and Anna Coliva, is titled after Wittkower's old oak branches, which is the honest description of where the discipline stands.

The 2017 to 2018 exhibition at the Galleria Borghese matters more than most shows because of what it physically did: it put objects beside each other. Setting the Escorial bronze crucifix next to the one in Toronto is what convinced Coliva and others that the Toronto attribution was weak. Setting the two Salvator Mundi busts face to face produced the same effect in reverse. Attribution in this field is still done by looking, and by looking at two things at once, which is why the shows change the catalogue and the catalogue does not change without the shows.

Chapter 14

What is happening to the work now

The Baldacchino was restored for the first comprehensive time in 260 years between February and October 2024.

The Baldacchino was restored for the first comprehensive time in 260 years between February and October 2024. The work was carried out by the Vatican Museums' restorers, ten to twelve of them, funded entirely by the Knights of Columbus at a cost of about seven hundred thousand euros, and unveiled on 27 October 2024 in time for the jubilee year. The head of the artistic and archaeological patrimony of St Peter's, Pietro Zander, gave the diagnosis: the whole surface carried a dark coating, and the deterioration is caused in part by the visitors themselves, up to fifty thousand a day, whose presence changes the microclimate of the basilica and drives the corrosion of the metal, the oxidation of the iron supports and the movement of the wooden parts. A conservation plan for the whole basilica is being built on the study of that microclimate.

In January 2025 the Rijksmuseum announced that it had received on permanent loan from a private collector the terracotta study model of a standing Triton for the Fontana del Moro, seventy-two centimetres high, made in 1653 and the only Bernini sculpture in the Netherlands. Its history is instructive: it stayed for centuries with the descendants of Cardinal Flavio Chigi, was hidden under a thick layer of dark paint that masked its quality, and was only recognised after the overpaint was removed in a 2018 restoration. The museum's view is that it is in all probability the modello fatto da me, the model made by myself, listed in Bernini's own invoice for the fountain in 1655; the marble was carved by his assistant Giovanni Antonio Mari. A second, more finished version of the same figure is at the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth.

From 12 February to 14 June 2026 the Gallerie Nazionali di Arte Antica showed Bernini e i Barberini at Palazzo Barberini, curated by Andrea Bacchi and Maurizia Cicconi, more than seventy works, timed to the four hundredth anniversary of the consecration of St Peter's in 1626 and mounted under the patronage of the Fabbrica di San Pietro. Among the objects shown was a medal found the previous year inside the sarcophagus of Urban VIII's tomb, bearing the pope on one face and the canopy on the other, which the evidence suggests had been worn on a cord round somebody's neck before being placed in the tomb. The curator's own caution about it is the model for how this material should be handled: it is tempting to imagine Bernini left it there, and that goes beyond what the documentation can prove.

What is documented

Eight popes
He worked in Rome under eight pontificates and held office continuously from 1629 to his death, including through the four years when he had lost favour. Alexander VII's summary was that if everything made by the Cavalier Bernini were removed from St Peter's, the temple would be stripped bare.1
He signed almost nothing
As with most seventeenth-century Roman sculpture, attribution rests on documents, on style and increasingly on technical examination rather than on signatures. This is why the corpus can move by whole works in a single publication.68
The paintings are a smaller problem than the sculpture
Baldinucci and Domenico Bernini both say he completed at least 150 canvases, mostly in the 1620s and 1630s. Between thirty-five and forty survive that can be confidently given to him. Only one, the Apostles Andrew and Thomas in the National Gallery in London, has a securely known attribution, approximate date and provenance together.1
About 350 drawings
A minuscule fraction of what he made. They divide into rapid sketches for commissions, finished presentation sheets given as gifts, and portrait drawings. The Morgan Library holds the Scipione Borghese and Sisinio Poli portraits; the Royal Collection at Windsor and the Uffizi hold others.1
He wrote and acted in plays
For years, especially under Urban VIII, he wrote, directed, acted in, designed and engineered Carnival comedies satirising Roman court life, staged often in his own house, with effects that reportedly included flooding the Tiber on stage and a controlled real fire. The surviving remains are the partial script of one play and a drawing of a sunset made for a stage effect.1
The workshop was the largest of its time
Among the sculptors who worked under him were Giuliano Finelli, Andrea Bolgi, Ercole Ferrata, Antonio Raggi, Francesco Baratta, Lazzaro Morelli, Giacomo Antonio Fancelli, Giovanni Antonio Mari, Niccolo Sale and his own brother Luigi. His most trusted assistant in sculpture was Giulio Cartari; in architecture, Mattia de' Rossi. Both went to Paris with him.1
Four grades of authorship
His output divides by how much of it is his: works of his own design and execution; works of his design and substantial execution; works of his design with little or none of his execution, such as the Madonna and Child in the Carmelite church in Paris, carved by Antonio Raggi; and works fully credited to the workshop that carry only his stylistic inspiration, such as several of the Ponte Sant'Angelo angels and all the saints on the St Peter's colonnade. The general rule is that the more prestigious and the earlier the commission, the more of it is his.1
He was rebuked and fined twice
Three thousand scudi for attempted homicide against his brother, remitted by Urban VIII; and a substantial fine for the failure of the St Peter's bell towers, a failure the investigations attributed to Maderno's foundations rather than to his design, and confirmed as such again in 1680.127
A Jesuit reader
His favourite books are recorded as Thomas a Kempis's Imitation of Christ and Ignatius Loyola's Spiritual Exercises; for the last forty years of his life he went to church daily and communicated twice a week; he was an intimate friend of the Jesuit general Gian Paolo Oliva and designed the frontispiece for the second volume of Oliva's Prediche. It was through him that Giovanni Battista Gaulli received the vault of the Gesu. A devotional account published by the Jesuit press adds that he made the Spiritual Exercises repeatedly and carried a copy with him; that source is tertiary and gives no archival citation.12830
He is on a banknote and a crater
The Bank of Italy put him on the front of the 50,000 lire note in the 1980s and 1990s, with his equestrian Constantine on the back. A crater near the south pole of Mercury was named after him in 1976.1
There is no tomb
He lies in the plain family vault in Santa Maria Maggiore with his parents. A funerary monument was designed around 1670 by his disciple Ludovico Gimignani and never built. Rome erected nothing public to him until 1898.1

Technique

Marble
Carrara, and colossal blocks where he could get them: the equestrian Louis XIV was cut from a single stone described by his biographers as the largest ever seen in Rome. Coliva's 2002 study established that the young Bernini accepted the sixteenth-century rule that a virtuoso group must be monolithic, and the Raccolta di statue antiche e moderne of 1704 duly records that the Apollo and Daphne was carved in un solo marmo.7
Piecing, and how to spot it
The monolith claim does not survive inspection. Part of Proserpina's hair is inserted; a large section of drapery in the David is a separate piece; the cord of David's sling is stone that is not continuous with the statue. Whether these were planned from the outset or repairs after the marble snapped is not established. From the 1630s he abandoned the rule openly and used drapery to hide joins, the St Longinus of 1631 to 1638 being the model for how it was done.7
Struts
Splayed fingers are made by drilling the gaps, hollowing with rasp and small chisel, and leaving bridges of stone to brace the fragile parts until the end. Many surviving sculptures still carry their struts, which shows that cutting them away was among the last operations and that sculptors sometimes lost their nerve and left them. The laurel stems between Daphne's fingers are struts before they are foliage, and the added weight of the leaves made them more necessary rather than less.7
Pentimenti in stone
The Apollo and Daphne carries a hole in the marble beside Daphne's right ring-finger where Bernini began to drill before realising the gap had to open further to one side. Apollo's right hand has broken and repaired fingers. The area next to the struts is among the most unfinished-looking passages in the whole statue.7
The drill is not a signature
Coliva, Peter Rockwell and their collaborators found the Apollo and Daphne more dependent on drillwork than any other early Bernini statue. It does not follow that heavy drillwork identifies him: Finelli's portrait busts show him a great master of the drill, and so do Pietro Bernini's statues closest in date to his son's earliest work. Drillwork places an object in this circle. It does not name the hand.7
Surface
Deep undercutting with drill and oval-tipped chisels, cross-hatching with a raking chisel, abrasives and rasps, with the finish varied deliberately across a single figure so that light pools and reflects where he wanted it. The St Longinus carries a tooth-marked surface that makes the colossal figure sparkle in the changing light of the crossing, and the same tooth marks appear on the surviving fragmentary clay model for it.8
Designed for one viewpoint
The Borghese groups are carved fully in the round but composed for a dominant view, and were originally set against walls so that the visitor met the dramatic instant first. The David has unfinished passages on the back because he expected it to stand against a wall of the Seneca Room; it was moved in the late eighteenth century and the shortcut became visible. A photograph taken from the wrong side is not a record of the sculpture.13
Clay first, and in quantity
He modelled small clay sketches with his fingers and tools before every major work, and modelled in groups rather than singly, which was unusual. Sandrart records being shown twenty-two wax models about twenty-six inches high, all for the single figure of Longinus, at a time when one or two was normal. No wax survives.8
The clay handwriting
The habits Anthony Sigel isolated at Harvard by close examination and x-radiography: clay pinched between thumb and index finger at the back of the neck; the thumb pushed around a limb rather than along its length; shoulders shaped by pushing or pulling the fingers from front to back beside the neck, leaving finger tracks and often a fingerprint in the displaced clay at the end of the stroke. Silicone poured into the grooves reconstructs the tools. Complete fingerprints are inventoried.81011
Bozzetto against modello
The distinction is functional and the seventeenth century used the words loosely. Bozzetti are the first three-dimensional thoughts, small and fast. Modelli are larger, more finished, made to be shown to a patron to win a commission or given to an assistant as a carving guide, and were often executed in part or in whole by the assistants. Treating a modello as evidence of the master's hand is therefore a category error.8
Overpaint
Collectors who acquired terracottas frequently had them painted or gilded to make them look more finished and precious. The Triton model now in the Rijksmuseum went unrecognised for centuries under a thick layer of dark paint and was only legible after a 2018 restoration removed it. A dark, dull terracotta is not necessarily a poor one.817
Architecture as optics
The Scala Regia joins two irregular buildings by deliberate optical illusion. The Cathedra Petri is placed so that the view down the nave compresses the tomb, the chair and the officiating pope into a single image framed by the Baldacchino. The 1633 gilding of the Baldacchino is documented as calibrated to the light of the transept so that the spiral columns change as the day changes. He designed for a moving eye and a moving light.1623

The surviving work

What is accepted
There is no single agreed figure and this page does not invent one. The current standard is Maria Grazia Bernardini's Bernini. Catalogo delle sculture (Allemandi, Turin, 2 vols., 2022; single-volume reissue 2024, 672 pages, 510 illustrations), which runs from the earliest works made with his father to the marble Salvator Mundi of 1679 and is built out from Wittkower's 1955 text rather than replacing it. The publisher describes the 2024 reissue as more inclusive, which is a statement that the boundary is editorial. Beyond sculpture: between 35 and 40 surviving paintings against at least 150 recorded by the early biographers, and about 350 surviving drawings. Of the terracotta models, 40 to 50 survive out of what Anthony Sigel estimates were thousands.
What is contested
Movement is constant and runs in both directions. OUT: the Goat Amalthea with the Infant Jupiter and a Faun, accepted from Roberto Longhi's endorsement of Sandrart in 1926 until Anna Coliva removed it in the Galleria Borghese Catalogo generale of 2022 (cat. 41), after Andrea Bacchi had questioned it on stylistic grounds in 2009; the bust of Antonio Coppola, reassigned to Pietro Bernini alone; the bronze Corpus in the Art Gallery of Ontario, on which Coliva's published position after the 2017 side-by-side comparison with the Escorial crucifix is that direct execution by Bernini is untenable. IN: a portrait on the cenotaph of Giovanni Angelo Frumenti in the Baptistery of Santa Maria Maggiore, proposed as autograph of about 1615 to 1617 by Steven Ostrow in the Burlington Magazine in July 2016; the Bust of Pope Paul V, sold twice as a copy and accepted by the Getty in 2015. RECLASSIFIED WITHOUT CHANGE OF HAND: the Damned Soul and Blessed Soul, catalogued by their first documented owner as a nymph and a satyr. Note also that a museum's website and its own printed catalogue can disagree: the Galleria Borghese's online entry for the Goat Amalthea still read Attributed to Bernini Gian Lorenzo on 25 August 2026.
Who rules on attribution
There is no board, committee or foundation that rules on Bernini attribution, and there never has been. What decides is publication and juxtaposition: a case made in a catalogue or a journal, tested by putting the object next to a secure one, and either absorbed or refused by the small number of scholars working on him. The names that have moved the corpus in the last twenty years are Anna Coliva and Andrea Bacchi at the Galleria Borghese, Tomaso Montanari, Francesco Petrucci, Steven Ostrow, Jennifer Montagu, Charles Scribner III and Franco Mormando, with the technical evidence supplied by Anthony Sigel and the conservation team at the Harvard Art Museums. A buyer should expect that an attribution can be argued in print against them, and that the two most consequential recent verdicts, on the Goat Amalthea and on the Toronto bronze, both came from a museum director writing in a catalogue rather than from any certifying body.

Catalogue raisonne

  • Rudolf Wittkower, Gian Lorenzo Bernini: The Sculptor of the Roman Baroque, London, 1955; updated 1966 and 1981; revised edition, Phaidon, London, 1997. The foundational modern catalogue and still the reference point. It is a catalogue of the sculpture, not of the paintings, drawings, architecture or ephemeral work, and it predates the entire technical literature on the terracottas, the archival work of the last forty years and every attribution change listed above. NOT CONSULTED IN THE ORIGINAL for this page.29
  • Maria Grazia Bernardini (ed.), Bernini. Catalogo delle sculture, Umberto Allemandi, Turin, 2 vols., 2022; single-volume reissue 2024, ISBN 9788842226338. The current standard catalogue of the sculpture, in chronological order from the earliest works with Pietro to the Salvator Mundi of 1679, with technical, documentary and bibliographical data and the critical history of each work. Its publisher states that it starts from Wittkower's 1955 text. Photography by Massimo Listri. NOT CONSULTED IN THE ORIGINAL.29
  • Anna Coliva (ed.), Galleria Borghese. Catalogo generale, Officina Libraria, 2022, vol. 1, Sculture moderne. Not a Bernini catalogue but decisive for the corpus, because the Borghese holds the early sculpture. Cat. 41 removes the Bernini attribution from the Goat Amalthea on stylistic, technical and documentary grounds. NOT CONSULTED IN THE ORIGINAL; read through Franco Mormando's summary and the museum's own online entries.64
  • Andrea Bacchi and Anna Coliva (eds.), Bernini, exhibition catalogue, Galleria Borghese, Rome, 2017-2018. The catalogue of the exhibition that changed more attributions than any publication of the period, because it physically juxtaposed contested objects. Includes Evonne Levy's survey of the field since the 1980s, Wittkower's Old Oak Branches, pp. 357-67, and Francesco Petrucci's entries on the two Salvator Mundi busts, one of which he marks with a question mark. NOT CONSULTED IN THE ORIGINAL.6
  • C. D. Dickerson III, Anthony Sigel and Ian Wardropper, Bernini: Sculpting in Clay, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2012, 432 pp. The catalogue of record for the terracottas and, in practice, the technical manual for Bernini attribution. Contains Sigel's Visual Glossary of modelling habits at pp. 87-107 and essays by Dickerson, Bacchi, Montanari, Ostrow and Wardropper. It confirms some attributions and reassigns others. NOT CONSULTED IN THE ORIGINAL; read through the Metropolitan's release and Michael Amy's review in caa.reviews.89
  • Anna Coliva, Bernini scultore: la tecnica esecutiva, Rome, 2002. The study of how he actually cut stone, and the source for the monolithic prescript he began by accepting. NOT CONSULTED IN THE ORIGINAL; read through Michael Cole's essay Bernini Struts.7
  • Franco Mormando (ed. and trans.), Domenico Bernini, The Life of Gian Lorenzo Bernini, Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011; and Franco Mormando, Bernini: His Life and His Rome, University of Chicago Press, 2011. The annotated edition of the primary biography, with 183 pages of notes and a bibliography of 700 entries, plus the anti-hagiographic modern biography. Mormando maintains a public updates page correcting and extending his own published work, which is the single most useful current source on shifting Bernini attributions.6
How affected and licentious are the Works of Bernini and Fontana?Colen Campbell, Vitruvius Britannicus, London, 1715, Introduction, vol. 1, p. 1 - the opening page of the book that taught British architecture to despise the Roman Baroque, and the reason Bernini spent roughly two centuries out of the canon

Questions about Gian Lorenzo Bernini

Who was Gian Lorenzo Bernini?

Sculptor; Architect; Urban planner; Painter; Draughtsman; Designer of fountains and tomb monuments; Theatre designer and playwright. 1598-1680.

When did Gian Lorenzo Bernini live?

Born 7 December 1598, Naples, then capital of the Spanish Viceroyalty of Naples; died 28 November 1680, Rome, at his house on the Via della Mercede.

How are fakes and misattributions of Gian Lorenzo Bernini detected?

The exposure on Bernini is misattribution, not forgery. No systematic forgery industry in Bernini comparable to the trade-label violin or the fake Old Master picture has been found in the sources read for this page. The recurring loss is different in kind: works that are genuinely from the workshop but not from his hand, works given to him on the authority of a single unreliable seventeenth-century sentence, and works by him that were sold as copies.

Where can you see work by Gian Lorenzo Bernini?

Galleria Borghese (Rome); St Peter's Basilica and the Vatican (Vatican City); Santa Maria della Vittoria (Rome); Santa Maria del Popolo, Sant'Andrea al Quirinale, Santa Maria sopra Minerva, San Francesco a Ripa, Ponte Sant'Angelo, Piazza Navona, Piazza Barberini (Rome); Museo Nazionale del Bargello (Florence); J. Paul Getty Museum (Los Angeles).

What does the market for Gian Lorenzo Bernini look like?

The market for Bernini is tiny, illiquid and dominated by attribution rather than by condition or provenance. Almost everything he made is immovable, in a Roman church or square or in the Galleria Borghese, or is state property.

What is still unresolved about Gian Lorenzo Bernini?

How many sculptures are actually his? No two authorities give the same figure, the standard catalogue was reissued in 2024 as a more inclusive edition, and the boundary between autograph, designed-and-part-executed, designed-only and workshop is drawn differently by every scholar who draws it.

Open questions

  • How many sculptures are actually his? No two authorities give the same figure, the standard catalogue was reissued in 2024 as a more inclusive edition, and the boundary between autograph, designed-and-part-executed, designed-only and workshop is drawn differently by every scholar who draws it.
  • How many terracottas survive? The Metropolitan's 2012 release counts fifteen at Harvard as the world's largest group and shows thirty-nine models; the 2012 catalogue examines fifty-two; Harvard Magazine in 2024 says thirteen on display and forty to fifty surviving in total. Nothing consulted reconciles the three counts.
  • Is the bronze Corpus in the Art Gallery of Ontario by Bernini? The gallery displays it as his. The former director of the Galleria Borghese has written that direct execution by him is untenable. No technical study of the casting has been published that would settle it, and the two competing documentary identifications cannot both be right.
  • Which surviving marble is the Salvator Mundi that Bernini left to Queen Christina? Three candidates have been proposed since 1972, in Norfolk, in Sees and in Rome, and the scholars who have looked hardest at all three do not agree.
  • How much of the Apollo and Daphne did Giuliano Finelli carve? Jennifer Montagu's argument that the most celebrated passages are his has never been refuted or accepted. No document decides it, and the drill evidence cannot, because Finelli, Pietro Bernini and Gian Lorenzo were all masters of the drill.
  • Were the inserted pieces in the David and the Rape of Proserpina planned, or are they repairs? Michael Cole sets out both possibilities and the evidence does not choose between them. It matters, because a repair implies the marble failed under his hand and a plan implies he never intended the monolith the literature credits him with.
  • Who actually manoeuvred the Four Rivers model in front of Innocent X? Baldinucci credits Prince Niccolo Ludovisi; other accounts credit the pope's sister-in-law Donna Olimpia Maidalchini. The sources read here do not reconcile them.
  • Why did Bernini never execute the two statues commissioned for the nave of St John Lateran in 1647? Seven drawings and a clay modello survive. No source consulted explains the abandonment, and it falls precisely in the years of his disgrace.
  • Where was the Bust of Pope Paul V between 1893 and 2014? Antonio Munoz placed it in a Viennese private collection in 1916 and the Artnet report names 1893 and 1917 in successive sentences for the Viennese purchase. Neither the collector's name nor the route to Bratislava is established.
  • What did the Getty pay? The reported thirty-three million dollars is a press figure for a private sale. The museum's own announcement names no price, there is no hammer, and no underbidder is known.
  • How many preparatory drawings and models were destroyed? Bernini's sons stored the clay models badly after his death and many perished; about 350 drawings survive from a working life of sixty years. Nothing establishes the original scale of either archive.
  • Was the marble skull now in Dresden carved by Bernini or by an assistant? The Dresden curator argues for his own hand from the timing of the commission; Franco Mormando argues for Bernini and workshop from the circumstances of 1655. The object has not been published with a technical study that would separate the two.

Sources

  1. 1Wikipedia, 'Gian Lorenzo Bernini', full article text retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY. Used for the biographical spine: birth and death dates and places, the move to Rome in 1606, the 1618 Barberini putti contract, the papal sequence, the appointment as Architect of St Peter's in 1629, the bell tower affair and its exonerations, the Innocent X eclipse, the Alexander VII programme, the Paris visit, the later years and burial, the workshop roster, the counts of surviving paintings and drawings, the theatre work, the four grades of authorship, and the reputation history including Winckelmann, Colen Campbell and Augustus Hare. Flagged for replacement with Mormando's edition of Domenico Bernini and with Bernardini's 2022 catalogue. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  2. 2Galleria Borghese, online collection catalogue, entry for Apollo and Daphne. Inventory CV, Room 3, 1622-1625, Carrara marble, height 243 cm; provenance Cardinal Scipione Borghese 1625, Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, purchased by the Italian state 1902; exhibitions 1998 and 2017-2018; conservation 1903, 1954, 1971 and 1996-1998. collezionegalleriaborghese.it/en/...
  3. 3Galleria Borghese, online collection catalogue, entry for David. Inventory LXXVII, Room 2, 1623-1624, white marble, height 170 cm. Source for the Montalto commission of March 1623 and its transfer to Scipione Borghese after Montalto's death in June, for the statement that Bernini's own physiognomy is recognisable in David's face, for the intended placement against a wall of the Seneca Room, and for the unfinished areas on the back. collezionegalleriaborghese.it/en/...
  4. 4Galleria Borghese, online collection catalogue, entry for The Goat Amalthea with the Infant Jupiter and a Faun. Headed 'Attributed to Bernini Gian Lorenzo' when read on 25 August 2026. Inventory CXVIII, Room 14, before 1615, marble, height 45 cm. Source for the 1615 payment to Giovanni Battista Soria for the base, for Manilli's 1650 mention without an artist, for Longhi's 1926 endorsement of Sandrart's 1675 attribution, and for the museum's own note that some critics do not consider it autograph. collezionegalleriaborghese.it/en/...
  5. 5Galleria Borghese, online collection catalogue, entry for Bust of Scipione Borghese, inventory CCLXV. 1632, Carrara marble, height 77.2 cm, Room 14. Source for the talking portrait formulation, for the crack across the forehead and the recarving in fifteen nights per Baldinucci or three days per Domenico, for the statement that the portrait was commissioned to Bernini by Pope Urban VIII, for the Estense archive report of 500 zecchini and a diamond worth 150 scudi via Fraschetti 1900, and for the payment of 500 scudi in December 1632 via Hibbard 1961. Purchased by the Italian state in 1892. collezionegalleriaborghese.it/en/...
  6. 6Franco Mormando, 'Bernini Updates 1', the Bernini scholar's own running corrections and additions to his published research, on his personal site. Used for: the removal of the Goat Amalthea attribution by Coliva in the 2022 Catalogo generale, cat. 41, and Bacchi's 2009 demolition of Sandrart's authority; Coliva's published position on the Art Gallery of Ontario bronze after the 2017 Borghese juxtaposition with the Escorial crucifix; the reassignment of the Antonio Coppola bust to Pietro Bernini; D'Amelio's 2021 publication of the 1633 gilding document 'Oro messo nelli bronzi'; the 1647 St John Lateran commission and the Leipzig drawings; the Dresden skull and the disagreement with the Dresden curator over its attribution; the Ostrow attribution of the Frumenti portrait, Burlington Magazine, July 2016; Garcia Cueto's 2015 reidentification of the Damned and Blessed Souls as a nymph and a satyr; the provenance of the Getty Paul V bust including the 1893 Algardi attribution and Antonio Munoz's 1916 report, with the Economist of 27 June 2015 as Mormando's own source; the LACMA Unidentified Gentleman; Leibniz's record of Claude Perrault's account of the Louvre affair; Perrault on the origin of the Louis XIV bust; the Ranuzzi letter of 17 December 1685 and the sons' pensions; Maral's month-by-month account of the equestrian statue's fate; McPhee on Costanza's legal name; and Evonne Levy's assessment of Montanari's La liberta di Bernini. francomormando.com/bernini-updates-2
  7. 7Michael Cole, 'Bernini Struts', chapter 3 of an edited volume, PDF hosted by the Department of Art History and Archaeology, Columbia University. The technical account used throughout: Coliva's 2002 finding on the monolithic prescript; the 1704 Raccolta di statue antiche e moderne and the 'in un solo marmo' claim; the inserted hair in the Rape of Proserpina and the inserted drapery and discontinuous sling cord in the David; the strut procedure and why struts survive; the pentimento hole beside Daphne's right ring-finger; the broken and repaired fingers on Apollo's right hand; the Coliva and Rockwell finding on drill dependence; the warning that Finelli and Pietro Bernini were equally masters of the drill; and Jennifer Montagu's argument that Finelli executed the most famous passages of the Apollo and Daphne. columbia.edu/cu/...
  8. 8Michael Amy, review of C. D. Dickerson III, Anthony Sigel and Ian Wardropper, Bernini: Sculpting in Clay, caa.reviews, 17 April 2013, DOI 10.3202/caa.reviews.2013.38. Source for the bozzetto and modello distinction and the fact that modelli were often made in part or whole by assistants; Sandrart's twenty-two wax models for the Longinus and the survival of none; the tooth marks on the Longinus marble and on the fragmentary model unearthed in 1982; the x-radiograph showing the Four Rivers lion cut in two and lengthened by an inserted wedge; the absence of any surviving model for the four Borghese groups; the eighteenth-century overpainting and gilding of collected terracottas; the loss of models badly stored by Bernini's sons; and the statement that the exhibition confirmed some attributions and reassigned others. caareviews.org/reviews/...
  9. 9Metropolitan Museum of Art, press release for Bernini: Sculpting in Clay, 3 October 2012 to 6 January 2013, and at the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, from 3 February 2013. Source for the thirty-nine terracottas and thirty drawings shown, for the fifteen from the Harvard Art Museums described as the largest collection of Bernini terracottas in the world and lent for the first time, for the lenders, and for the curatorial and catalogue credits. metmuseum.org/press-releases/...
  10. 10Anthony (Tony) Sigel, 'The clay modeling techniques of Gian Lorenzo Bernini', abstract, Objects Specialty Group Postprints, American Institute for Conservation, vol. 7, 2000. Source for the 1937 Fogg purchase of twenty-seven terracottas of which fifteen plus a 1995 modello are associated with Bernini, for the three-year Straus Center study and its publication as a Harvard University Art Museums Bulletin edited by Ivan Gaskell and Henry Lie in spring 1999, for the framing question of what technically characterises a model from Bernini's hand, and for the method being close visual examination and x-radiography. Only the abstract is published at this address. resources.culturalheritage.org/osg-postprints/...
  11. 11Nina Pasquini, 'Bernini's Model Masterpieces at the Harvard Art Museums', Harvard Magazine, May-June 2024, published as 'Model Masterpieces'. Source for thirteen models on display as the largest such collection in the world, for the estimate that forty to fifty survive out of thousands made, for the five models for the Altar of the Blessed Sacrament angels and the change from half-kneeling to fully kneeling, for the ruled measuring lines used in scaling, and for Anthony Sigel's account of the pinched thumb and forefinger at the back of the neck. harvardmagazine.com/2024/...
  12. 12J. Paul Getty Museum, press release, 'Recently Rediscovered Bernini Acquired by Getty Museum', 17 June 2015. Source for the acquisition of the Bust of Pope Paul V (1621), for the statement that Scipione Borghese commissioned it a few months after the pope's death and that it was in the Borghese collection until the 1893 auction, for the record that it was previously known only through the 1893 catalogue photograph, the commission documents and Sebastiano Sebastiani's bronze of 1621-22 in the Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen, for the display of the busts of uncle and nephew as pendants in the Villa Borghese from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century, and for the Getty's other Bernini holdings. The release names no price. getty.edu/news/...
  13. 13Henri Neuendorf, 'Slovakian Dealer Makes a Fortune with Resale of $33 Million Bernini Bust To Getty Museum', Artnet News, 27 July 2015. Source for the reported 33 million dollar private sale arranged by Sotheby's, the 2013 consignment by the heirs of Ernest Zmetak at an estimate of 47,000 euros which failed to sell, the September 2014 sale at a pre-sale estimate of 24,000 euros to an unnamed Slovak dealer, and Johann Kraftner's statement that he was offered the bust and courteously declined on provenance grounds. The article is internally inconsistent, giving 1893 in one sentence and 1917 in another for the Viennese purchase, and says the location after 1893 cannot be verified. Fetched through the in-app browser after a direct request returned HTTP 403. news.artnet.com/art-world/...
  14. 14Sotheby's, press release, 'Sotheby's Presents Fearless: The Collection of Hester Diamond', 16 October 2020. Source for the Autumn estimate of 8 to 12 million dollars, for the attribution to Pietro and Gian Lorenzo Bernini, for the carving date of 1616 when Gian Lorenzo was eighteen and the commission by Prince Leone Strozzi, for the statement that it is one of only a handful of Bernini and Pietro Bernini sculptures remaining in private hands, and for the statement that the terracotta bozzetto Il Moro sold at Sotheby's London in 2002 for 3.2 million dollars and was then the auction record for the artist. sothebys.com/en/...
  15. 15Angelica Villa, 'Bernini, Coecke Set Records in $26.7 M. Hester Diamond Collection Sale', ARTnews, 29 January 2021. Source for the hammer of 7.5 million dollars against a low estimate of 8 million, for the premium-inclusive total of 8.9 million as a new record for the artist, for the opening bid of 7 million and the telephone buyer with Margi Schwartz, and for the sale totals of 26.7 million with 11 of 49 lots unsold. artnews.com/art-news/...
  16. 16Angelica Villa, 'Rare Bernini Drawing Sells in France for $2.3 M., Setting Record', ARTnews, 22 March 2021. Source for the sale at Acteon in Compiegne on 20 March 2021 of the red chalk Academie d'homme of about 1630-1640: estimate 30,000 to 50,000 euros, hammer 1.55 million euros, total 1.9 million euros, a record for a Bernini drawing against a previous record of 139,000 euros in 2014; for the discovery of the sheet by the auctioneer Philomene Wolf in a French estate with an initial attribution to Pierre Puget and its review by the old master specialist Patrick de Bayser; and for Dominique Le Coent's statements about the buyer and about the seven other known academy drawings. artnews.com/art-news/...
  17. 17Rijksmuseum, press release, 'Rijksmuseum receives sculpture by famous Italian artist Bernini', 22 January 2025. Source for the permanent loan of the 72 cm terracotta study model of a standing Triton for the Fontana del Moro, made 1653; for its being the only Bernini sculpture in the Netherlands; for its descent in the family of Cardinal Flavio Chigi and its concealment under thick dark paint removed in a 2018 restoration; for the marble having been carved by Bernini's assistant Giovanni Antonio Mari; for the identification with the 'modello fatto da me' in Bernini's 1655 invoice; and for the more finished second version at the Kimbell Art Museum. rijksmuseum.nl/en/...
  18. 18Courtney Mares (CNA), 'PHOTOS: Restoration of Bernini's Baldacchino Begins in St. Peter's Basilica', National Catholic Register, 27 February 2024. Source for the restoration cost of 700,000 euros funded by the Knights of Columbus, for the team of ten to twelve Vatican Museums restorers, for the completion date of December 2024 for the jubilee, for the height given as 92 feet, for Urban VIII's commission of 1624, and for Pietro Zander's account of the degraded state, the dark coating, the 50,000 daily visitors and the microclimatic damage. ncregister.com/cna/...
  19. 19Victoria Cardiel (EWTN News / ACI Prensa), 'A Pope's Magnificent Bet On a Young Bernini', National Catholic Register, 5 March 2026. Report on the Palazzo Barberini exhibition. Source for the June 1623 start of excavation for the canopy foundations before the November 1626 consecration, for the cardinals' fear of profaning the tomb and the preservation of every portion of excavated soil, for the curator Maurizia Cicconi's attribution of the volute solution to Borromini after an early scheme with arches and a triumphant Christ proved unworkable, for the medal found inside Urban VIII's sarcophagus and the curator's own caution about over-reading it, and for the loan of the Francesco Barberini bust from Washington. ncregister.com/cna/...
  20. 20Gallerie Nazionali Barberini Corsini, official exhibition page for 'Bernini e i Barberini', Palazzo Barberini, 12 February to 14 June 2026, curated by Andrea Bacchi and Maurizia Cicconi, under the patronage of the Fabbrica di San Pietro and timed to the four hundredth anniversary of the consecration of St Peter's in 1626. barberinicorsini.org/en/...
  21. 21Jonathan Salem-Wiseman, 'But is it a Bernini? A Tale of Contested Identity in the Art World', Quillette, 4 September 2023. An argued essay, not a peer-reviewed article, and treated as such. Source for the history of the Art Gallery of Ontario bronze: the 1908 Venice sale, the Geraldine Rockefeller Dodge collection, the 1975 Sotheby's estate sale where it was catalogued as French late 17th century and failed to reach a 200 dollar asking price, the attributions by Maurizio Fagiolo dell'Arco in 2002 and Tomaso Montanari in 2005, the 25 million dollar purchase by Murray Frum and the 2006 gift to the AGO with a subsequent appraisal of about 50 million, and Charles Scribner III's pastiche argument resting on the absent side wound and on the loincloth's resemblance to Algardi. quillette.com/2023/...
  22. 22Wikipedia, 'Ecstasy of Saint Teresa', retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY. Source for the completion in 1652 at a cost of 12,000 scudi, for Federico Cornaro's choice of the Discalced Carmelite church for his burial chapel and the earlier St Paul in Ecstasy on the site, for Teresa's canonisation in 1622, for the hidden window in the dome of the aedicule and the gilded stucco rays, for the Cornaro relief portraits in the theatre boxes, for the terracotta model of about 47 cm in the Hermitage with Bernini's fingerprints, for Wittkower's remark on the differentiated degrees of reality, for Lavin on the transverberation, for Mormando's statement about what Bernini supplied beyond Teresa's text, and for the long history of the decency objection. Flagged for replacement with the Cornaro Chapel literature. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  23. 23Wikipedia, 'St. Peter's Baldachin', retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY. Source for the commission by Urban VIII with work from 1623 to 1634, the four helical columns 20 metres high cast in sections, the derivation of the helical form from the columns believed brought from the Temple in Jerusalem and the eight survivors on the piers, the Barberini bees and laurel and the radiant sun on the underside, the dispute over the Pantheon bronze and Urban's accounts, the Pasquino lampoon, Borromini's collaboration and the roster of contributors, the resolution of the high altar problem through the Cathedra Petri, and the childbirth sequence on the eight plinth shields with its three competing explanations. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  24. 24Wikipedia, 'Fountain of the Four Rivers', retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY. Source for the four river gods as the four continents of papal authority and their attributes, for Baldinucci's account of Niccolo Ludovisi smuggling the model into the Palazzo Pamphilj and the pope's remark, for the unveiling on 12 June 1651 and the Pamphilj-funded festival, for the construction at public expense during the famine of 1646-48 and the September 1648 pasquinades demanding bread, for the arrests and the plain-clothes spies, for the expulsion of the street vendors including the Roman Jews' Wednesday market, and for the refutation of the story that a river god averts his gaze from Borromini's facade. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  25. 25Wikipedia, 'Equestrian statue of Louis XIV (Bernini)', retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY. Source for Bernini's arrival in Paris on 3 June 1665 and the sequence of three Louvre designs with Colbert's objection about the king's room and the street noise, for the cornerstone ceremony and the halt to construction on Bernini's departure, for the shipping from Civitavecchia in autumn 1684 and the arrival at Versailles on 1 October 1685, for Courcillon's record of the king's reaction on 14 November 1685, for the single block, for the relationship to the Vision of Constantine, and for Girardon's recutting. Where this source and Mormando's summary of Maral's catalogue differ on the mechanics of the recutting, this page follows Maral through Mormando. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  26. 26Wikipedia, 'Bust of the Saviour', retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY and very short. Source for the bequest to Queen Christina of Sweden, for Francesco Petrucci's 2001 identification of the bust now in San Sebastiano fuori le Mura, and for Tomaso Montanari's dissent in favour of the Chrysler Museum version. Flagged for replacement with Charles Scribner III, 'Imago Christi: Bernini's Saviors, Lost and Found', and with the 2017 Borghese catalogue entries by Petrucci. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  27. 27Wikipedia, 'Bust of Costanza Bonarelli', retrieved through the MediaWiki extracts API. TERTIARY and uneven in quality. Used only for the fine of three thousand scudi for attempted homicide against Luigi Bernini and its remission by Urban VIII, and for the location of the bust in the Bargello. The remainder of the affair is taken from the main Bernini article and the correction of Costanza's legal name from McPhee through Mormando. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  28. 28Judith Hook, 'Bernini and Rome', History Today, vol. 21, issue 7, July 1971. Only the opening section is readable without subscription. Source for the friendship with the Jesuit general Gian Paolo Oliva and the frontispiece designed for the second volume of Oliva's Prediche, for the identification of the Imitation of Christ and the Spiritual Exercises as his favourite books, and for the statement that for the last forty years of his life he went to church every day and took communion twice a week. Hook gives no archival citation for these, and they should be checked against Domenico Bernini and Baldinucci. Fetched successfully on 25 August 2026; a repeat request minutes later returned HTTP 403, which is a rate limit and not a dead link. historytoday.com/archive/...
  29. 29Societa Editrice Allemandi, publisher's page for Maria Grazia Bernardini (ed.), Bernini. Catalog of sculptures, single-volume reissue, 2024, 672 pages, 510 illustrations, ISBN 9788842226338, after the two-volume first edition of 2022. Source for the publisher's own description of the 2024 edition as a more inclusive reissue, for the statement that the catalogue starts from Wittkower's 1955 text, for the chronological arrangement from the earliest works made with Pietro to the last, and for the content of the individual entries. en.allemandi.com/libro/...
  30. 30IgnatianSpirituality.com (Loyola Press), 'Gianlorenzo Bernini (1598-1680)'. TERTIARY and devotional in purpose, cited here only for the claims that he made the Spiritual Exercises a number of times, carried a copy daily and attended Mass daily at the Gesu, and for the report that an art historian called him the most powerful advocate of the Society of Jesus. No archival citation is given for any of it and it should not be relied on without checking the early biographies. ignatianspirituality.com/ignatian-voices/...
Cite this pageIconotheca, “Gian Lorenzo Bernini”, The Provenance Record, iconotheca.com/artists/gian-lorenzo-bernini/, version of 17 September 2026.

Last verified 17 September 2026

Back to top

The Iconotheca Letter

One artwork and its story every Tuesday, with the picture: who owned it, what it made, and what closes soon in the exhibition calendar. No promotion, and nothing we cannot cite.

We send one email to confirm the address and keep nothing else. Every letter carries a one-click unsubscribe. How we handle your data.