The Seizure That Built the Museum

A revolutionary confiscation is the one taking nobody now asks to be undone

Between 1789 and about 1810 the French state took a very large quantity of art out of churches, monasteries, royal palaces and private houses, and in this archive five objects carry that event in their ownership history. It's the largest single category of taking in the corpus after wartime looting, and it's the only one against which no claim is currently pressed by anyone.

The reasons are structural rather than moral. The seizures fall outside the 1933 to 1945 span that the Washington Principles and the national panels built after them address. They aren't colonial acquisitions, so the argument about museum constitutions and inalienability that governs the Benin material doesn't apply. And title was settled at the time by the legislation of the state doing the confiscating, which then built the public museums that the objects entered. The result is that the mechanism which did the most to create the modern French museum is also the one least examined in restitution terms, and the objects themselves show why the accounting isn't simple: the seizure saved some of them and came close to destroying others.

The Bayeux Tapestry was requisitioned in 1794 and paraded in Paris nine years later

The Bayeux Tapestry became state property in 1794, when the Arts Commission for the Bayeux district confiscated it on behalf of the nation. The museum that holds it today describes that act as the thing which ensured it was protected. Before that it had belonged to the cathedral, where the earliest firm record of its existence dates only from 1476, four centuries after the embroidery was made.

The story most often told about the Revolution and this object is the one the museum is careful with. By persistent local tradition it narrowly avoided being cut up in 1792 to make covers for soldiers' carts, and was saved by a local lawyer, Leonard Lambert-Leforestier. The Bayeux museum repeats the account and marks it as tradition; no source consulted here traces it to a contemporary document. The confiscation two years later is a different kind of fact, because it left paperwork.

What the state then did with its new property was political. On 15 November 1803 the Interior Minister asked for the tapestry to be sent to Paris for the Napoleon Museum, and it was displayed at the Louvre from 6 December 1803 to 18 February 1804, tying a planned invasion of England to a successful one seven and a half centuries earlier. It went back to Bayeux by Napoleon's own order. Vivant Denon's letter on its return records that the First Consul was very interested to see this precious commemoration of French history, and congratulates the townspeople of Bayeux on the care they had taken to preserve it over seven and a half centuries, which is a striking thing to write to people from whom the object had been requisitioned.

A Mamluk basin went into a revolutionary depot and came out at a royal baptism

The brass basin known as the Baptistere de Saint Louis is inlaid with gold and silver, signed six times by its maker Muhammad ibn al-Zain, and was made in Mamluk Egypt or Syria in the first half of the fourteenth century. It is first securely recorded in the French royal treasury at the Sainte-Chapelle de Vincennes around 1440, with no explanation of how it got there, and from 1606 it was used to baptise French royal children.

In early 1793 it was sent from the royal treasury to the Petits-Augustins depot, the rescue operation for art and historical objects run by Alexandre Lenoir, and entered the new Museum national des arts shortly afterwards. The sources disagree on the exact date, 17 January against 7 March, which is itself characteristic of a year in which a great deal moved quickly and the paperwork was made under pressure.

The revealing part is what happened when the political weather changed. In 1818, by royal order of the restored Bourbons, the basin left the museum and went back to Vincennes. It was used again for the baptism of Henri d'Artois, Duke of Bordeaux, at Notre-Dame de Paris on 1 May 1821, and two silver plaques bearing French royal arms were added to it for the occasion. A seizure had turned a dynastic object into a museum object; a restoration turned it back into a dynastic one, and left marks on the thing itself.

The Apocalypse Tapestry was cut up, and the cutting is why the pieces survive

The Apocalypse Tapestry was woven in Paris in about 1377 to 1382 for Louis I, Duke of Anjou, after designs by the court painter Hennequin de Bruges, and ran to roughly 140 metres. It is the oldest and largest surviving monumental tapestry cycle from medieval Europe. It was already neglected before the Revolution, having been taken out of the choir of Angers Cathedral in 1767.

During the revolutionary period it was cut into pieces and put to documented, unglamorous work. The recorded uses include winter protection for the orange trees of the Abbey of Saint-Serge and service as coverings. Restitution to the church was obtained around 1803 under Bishop Montault-Desilles, after which it was stored at the former Angers seminary in the custody of Toussaint Grille and deteriorated in damp conditions rather than being displayed.

This is the case that resists a clean moral. The seizure is the reason large sections were lost, and it's also the reason the surviving sections were still in the country, in secular hands, and eventually recoverable. An object that is being used to keep frost off orange trees is being treated as material rather than as art, and in this archive that demotion is one of the commoner ways a fragile thing gets through a century it would not otherwise have survived.

State custody did not produce a record, and one chair proves it

The assumption that a confiscation at least generates documentation does not survive contact with the corpus. An armchair made in 1788 for the King's gaming room at the chateau de Saint-Cloud is one of sixteen supplied by Georges Jacob to the royal Garde-Meuble, and the commission survives in the Metropolitan Museum's own accounts down to the livre: twenty-four for Jacob's joinery, one hundred and eighty for the unnamed carver, two hundred and forty for Louis-Francois Chatard's gilding. That's a better paper trail than most eighteenth-century furniture carries.

Then the monarchy was abolished, the chateau and its contents became state property, and the record stops. No owner, sale, dealer or inventory places this chair anywhere between its last recorded presence at Saint-Cloud in spring 1798 and its appearance in the Paris collection of Georges Hoentschel by 1908 at the latest. That's a gap of about 110 years opening immediately after the state took possession. The chateau itself burned in 1870 and was demolished, which is why the chair and its siblings are now among the more informative physical witnesses to a vanished royal interior, and why the missing century matters.

Suppressing the monasteries moved a map into a national library

The last of the five is the quietest and the most consequential for scholarship. Fra Mauro's world map was made around 1450 in the Camaldolese monastery of San Michele in Isola in Venice, oriented with south at the top and carrying close to three thousand descriptive legends. It broke with the schematic mappaemundi that came before it, and its rendering of the shape of Africa anticipated the continent's circumnavigability without yet proving it.

Around 1810 Napoleon's suppression of religious orders in the former Venetian territories ended the Camaldolese community's tenure of San Michele. The map passed into state custody and was moved to the Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, where it remains. It was shown in the Doge's Palace for an extended period from about 1811. No one was dispossessed in a sense that a court would now recognise, because the order that owned it had been abolished by the same instrument that took the map, and the effect was to move a monastic object into a public research library four decades before Italy existed as a state.

How to read a revolutionary line in a provenance

Treat the date as the first thing to check, because the French revolutionary and Napoleonic takings cluster tightly and each year in the sequence means something different. A 1789 to 1793 entry generally records crown or church property becoming state property. A 1794 entry is often a formal requisition with a commission behind it and therefore a document. An entry around 1803 to 1810 usually reflects Napoleonic policy applied outside France, including the suppression of religious houses in annexed territories, and those objects frequently moved into libraries rather than galleries.

Then check what happened after 1815, because the Restoration reversed some of it selectively and the reversals are informative about how the object was understood. The basin went back to the crown; the map did not go back to the monks. And do not assume that state custody closed a gap. On the evidence here it is as likely to open one, because a confiscating administration inventories what it takes for its own purposes and not for a future reader, and the object can then move within the state for a century leaving nothing a researcher can follow.

Why this archive is free to read

We do this for everyone who loves art. The people who have studied it for years, and the people who just stopped to look. Iconotheca exists so that what we learn belongs to all of them.

Nobody pays us for this. No ads, no sponsors, no commercial interest. These works belong to all of us, and we would rather share them with as many people as we can than keep them to ourselves.

If it gave you something today, tell us to keep going. Follow us, leave a like, or write a positive comment. We read every one, and they are what keeps us going.