The record price is usually the last price

Four category records in this archive ended in a museum within seven years

Four auction records in this archive were set by a buyer who took the object into a public museum within seven years, which means the record price was also the last price the object will ever have. We are stating that as a pattern in the archive, not as a law of the market, and we counted it on the records that carry a category record: highest price for a work of art at auction in Britain, for an Old Master, for a Faberge piece, for a Russian work of art, for a timepiece, for a painting anywhere, and for a named artist. The four cases are in the table, and the fifth row is the case where the object is still in private hands and its price was tested three times inside five years: 80 million dollars and 127.5 million on consecutive days in 2013, then the 2017 record.

The reason to care is what the word record does to a reader. A record sounds like the top of something, a mark that later sales will approach. In these four cases it is the opposite: it is the moment the object left the price system altogether. The figure is not a high point on a curve; it is the last point, and there is no curve after it.

Rubens: the record buyer had already promised the picture to a museum

The Massacre of the Innocents made 45 million pounds at the hammer at Sotheby's in London on 10 July 2002, and the man whose money bought it had already committed his collection to the Art Gallery of Ontario. The Antiques Trade Gazette reported the sale under a headline giving the hammer figure and named the bidder in the room, the Mayfair dealer Sam Fogg, who was acting for Kenneth Thomson, second Baron Thomson of Fleet. The total with fees was 49.5 million, and that is the figure most later accounts repeat without saying which number they are quoting. Our record keeps the two apart.

The picture had been catalogued from 1780 as the work of a Rubens assistant, Jan van den Hoecke, sold out of the Liechtenstein collection in 1920, and lent from 1923 to a monastery in upper Austria by an owner who disliked it. George Gordon of Sotheby's saw it in 2001 and gave it back to Rubens, so the reattribution was made by the house that would earn the commission, before the sale, and the gain went to the eighty-nine-year-old consignor. After the sale Thomson lent the panel to the National Gallery in London, where it hung near the Samson and Delilah that had authenticated it. Thomson died in 2006. The panel went to Toronto in 2008 as the rebuilt gallery reopened, and it carries the accession number 2014/1581 in the Thomson Collection.

So the 2002 price is the last price. The Old Master record it set was beaten, in the sense that a different object made more: the Salvator Mundi attributed to Leonardo, at 400 million dollars hammer on 15 November 2017. The Rubens itself has been to Antwerp on loan and back to Toronto, and has not been to a saleroom, and there is no mechanism by which it will. What the market knows about this panel it learned in one afternoon and will never update.

The Rothschild egg: a record that a different egg took back

The Rothschild egg set three auction records at Christie's in London on 28 November 2007, at 8,980,500 pounds with premium, and lost the Faberge record on 2 December 2025 to an object that has stayed in private hands and kept coming back. The 2007 result was the highest price for any Russian work of art, any Faberge object and any timepiece; one source separates a hammer of 8 million pounds from the total, and the others report only the total. The buyer was the Russian collector Alexander Ivanov. On 8 December 2014, at the Hermitage's 250th-anniversary reception, President Putin presented the egg to the museum, and the reported credit line names Ivanov as the donor acting through that presentation. The Moscow Times account of the evening quotes Putin saying that he and his colleagues had not arrived empty-handed.

Eighteen years later the Winter Egg, an Imperial egg of 1913, sold at Christie's London for 22.8 million pounds, about 30.2 million dollars, and Christie's head of department called it a new world auction record for a work by Faberge. The Winter Egg had already set the same record twice, at Christie's Geneva in 1994 and at Christie's New York in 2002, before the Rothschild egg passed it. It has done so because its owners have been private collectors who sold. The Rothschild egg, in a state museum by presidential gift, cannot answer.

This is the cleanest demonstration in the archive of what a record actually measures. It is not the value of the best egg; it is the value of the best egg that was for sale that year. The record has changed hands three times among objects, and every time the winning object was one that was still in a market. The Rothschild egg's 2007 figure is now a historical price, a decade and a half old, attached to an object whose next price does not exist.

Gentileschi: one year from a regional saleroom to Trafalgar Square

Artemisia Gentileschi's Self Portrait as Saint Catherine of Alexandria made 1,850,000 euros at the hammer at the Hotel Drouot in Paris on 19 December 2017, an auction record for the artist, and was bought by the National Gallery in London by private treaty in 2018 for 3.6 million pounds. The Drouot sale, conducted by Christophe Joron-Derem, had estimated it at 300,000 to 400,000 euros. With premium the total was 2,360,600 euros. The buyers were the dealers Marco Voena and Fabrizio Moretti, and the picture entered the stock of Robilant + Voena in London.

The National Gallery's press release of July 2018 gives the price and itemises who paid it: the American Friends of the National Gallery, the National Gallery Trust, the Art Fund through the legacy of Sir Denis Mahon, Lord and Lady Sassoon, Lady Getty, Hannah Rothschild and other donors. Our record breaks the total down as 2.7 million from the American Friends, 380,000 from the Trust, 250,000 from the Art Fund and 280,000 from gifts and legacies. The gallery bought it as only the second painting by a woman it had acquired since 1991 and the first Gentileschi in the collection.

The gap between the two prices is the only place in this piece where a dealer's margin is visible, and it is visible only because the museum bought second. Roughly 1.5 times the auction total, seven months later, for a picture that had been researched, its provenance checked against the 1933-45 gap and its conservation planned, is the ordinary economics of a rediscovery. What matters for the argument is that the record set in Paris was the picture's last auction price, and the private-treaty figure in London was its last price of any kind. The artist's record is now held by a picture that will not be sold, and the next Gentileschi to come up will be measured against a figure its own object cannot revisit.

Juan de Pareja: the record buyer was the museum itself

Velazquez's portrait of Juan de Pareja was sold at Christie's in London on 27 November 1970 for 2,200,000 guineas, which is 2,310,000 pounds, the first painting to pass a million pounds at auction and the world record for any picture, and the winning bid was placed by Alec Wildenstein for the Metropolitan Museum of Art. There was no buyer's premium: the London houses introduced it in September 1975. The number the auctioneer called and the number on the invoice were the same, which is why the record carries one figure and not two.

The underbidder tells you how deep the price was. The National Gallery in London holds, under reference NGA27/24/17/15, Geoffrey Agnew's account of his firm's attempt to buy the picture for the National Gallery of Art in Washington, catalogued under the title The One That Got Away. Two American museums bidding through two dealers set the record between them. It was not a single collector's outlier; it was a floor agreed by two institutions, one of which then owned the picture and the other of which wrote up the loss.

The picture entered the Met as accession 1971.86 and is on view in Gallery 625. It had sat with the Earls of Radnor at Longford Castle for about 140 years before the sale, and it has now sat in New York for fifty-five. The 1970 record has since been passed many times over by other pictures, the Salvator Mundi among them. This one has had no price since, and the market's only observation of it is a number in guineas from a sale with no premium, converted by anyone who needs a dollar figure at a rate that no longer exists.

A multiple keeps its record contestable, which is the exception that explains the rule

The monumental Thinker in the garden of the Musee Rodin has no price and never will, and the records for The Thinker are set by other casts of the same figure, which is why that record keeps moving while the four above stand still. The garden bronze, inventory S.01295, was poured by Alexis Rudier in 1904, paid for by public subscription, stood in front of the Pantheon from 1906 and was moved to the Hotel Biron in 1922. It is French state property. The Musee Rodin has cast from Rodin's plasters since he gave them to France in 1916, and French law treats an edition as original only within twelve.

The prices belong to the others. Sotheby's in New York sold a lifetime cast of the original size, made in 1906 for Ralph Pulitzer, on 7 May 2013 for 15,285,000 dollars with premium. Christie's in Paris sold a posthumous cast of about 1928 in 2022 for a reported 10.7 million euros. A small posthumous cast made 1,568,750 pounds at Sotheby's in London in February 2016, which fixes the bottom of the range. Every one of those objects is in private hands and can come back, and when one does, the record for a Thinker will be tested again by a Thinker.

That is the contrast the four museum cases need. A record is a fact about a category only while the category still contains objects that can be sold. For a unique object that a museum has absorbed, the record is a fact about one afternoon. For a multiple, it is a live number, because the population of sellable objects has not gone to zero. The reason the Thinker's record can be beaten by a Thinker, and the Massacre's cannot be beaten by the Massacre, is not the art; it is the count.

What that does to the figure in the record

A record price attached to an object now in a museum is the last observation the market will make of that object, and the record should say so beside the figure. We already separate hammer from premium and record the currency on every result, and the reason is the same: a number without its conditions misleads. A record without the note that the object has since left the market misleads in a specific way, by implying that the figure is a benchmark the object could confirm or fail. It cannot. The Massacre has been off the market for twenty-four years, the Pareja for fifty-five, and neither figure has been tested since.

The Salvator Mundi is the row in the table that shows the alternative. It set the largest record of all on 15 November 2017 and went to a buyer whose principal is disputed, and no museum has shown it; our record places it, on a named source's account, in storage in Geneva. It could come back. That possibility, and not the size of the figure, is what makes its record a live number and the other four dead ones. When we read a record in a catalogue note, the question we now ask first is not how much but whether the same object could ever be sold again, and in the cases we hold the answer is mostly no.

Does that make the four figures useless? No. They are the best evidence there is of what two institutions, or one dealer with a museum behind him, would pay on a given day for a given object. It makes them historical, in the same way the 39 guineas the Pareja made in 1801 is historical: a true price, at a date, in a currency, for an object that then went somewhere the market could not follow. The record line in our entries now carries that fact, and we would rather a reader saw the word last beside the word record than took the one for the other.

Why this archive is free to read

We do this for everyone who loves art. The people who have studied it for years, and the people who just stopped to look. Iconotheca exists so that what we learn belongs to all of them.

Nobody pays us for this. No ads, no sponsors, no commercial interest. These works belong to all of us, and we would rather share them with as many people as we can than keep them to ourselves.

If it gave you something today, tell us to keep going. Follow us, leave a like, or write a positive comment. We read every one, and they are what keeps us going.